7/1/2005 - Canadian Large Cent

[Guest Stujoe]

[Art]

EF45 for me. Maybe the pic or my eyes but it appears to have minimum wear on the face and highspots of the crown. Even wear on the reverse letters.

[izzy452]

EF45

[ccg]

VF35, middle arch weak, also band weaknesses, and flat moustache.

[Tiffibunny]

I actually voted VF35 myself.

[Mediccoin]

I went with EF45.

[mrcentavo]

vf 30

[knowtracks]

I guessed VF-35

[Cojaro]

I chose AU50 but I would say it's a low gradeAU50.

 

More likely an EF45

[Burks]

I went VF. Looks like there is some wear.

[stu62]

VF-20 the band isalittle weak in the center.

[dacoinman]

Agreed. If the band was a little stronger I would have said VF-35, but I chose VF-20.

VF-20 the band isalittle weak in the center.

[numismatistnick]

I would say VF-35. The diamonds on the crown are a little sharper on XF's that I have bought.

[gpnyc]

I'm way off the bell curve on this one. I see minimal wear and nice original surfaces fully deserving of an AU-55 grade. I guess I have no idea how to grade these.

[Sir Sisu]

I'm way off the bell curve on this one.  I see minimal wear and nice original surfaces fully deserving of an AU-55 grade.  I guess I have no idea how to grade these.

 

I am not a pro on these either, but I believe the two main items that knock it below an AU grade are obverse: center crown arch well worn, beads barely recognizable; and reverse: leaves are all well rounded and not sharp.

 

I would say E40 - or in Finnish speak 1+.

[charon]

VF20