tmoneyeagles Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Lets see what you guys say.... Graded by NGC.... I say it is undergraded by one grade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmoneyeagles Posted May 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Here is the reverse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedeadpoint Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 MS 64 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Stilson Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Hard to say with the small pictures. (Little fuzzy too.) No apparent real wear. Obverse seems to have a lot of chatter on the nose and cheek also the field in front of the nose was probably limiting. Reverse looks a lot cleaner. MS63 In the old days when some companies gave split grades the reverse looks like it would have made 65. Heres a 63 of mine close to yours but it has too many hits on the face to make more then 63. Reverse looks great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmoneyeagles Posted May 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 I had to compress the pictures, because this site wouldn't let me upload the originals, so that is why the turned out a little fuzzy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KoRnholio Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 NGC MS 64 I'd say. BTW I use imagecave.com for all my pictures, they allow you to upload some pretty large pictures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmoneyeagles Posted May 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Okay I tried image cave thingy...Lets see if this works Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmoneyeagles Posted May 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Thank you so much, now I will use that!!! THANKS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedeadpoint Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Can't see your second set of pics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmoneyeagles Posted May 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 That is weird, they were there a minute ago! hmmm... Here we go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Stilson Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Sticking with the 63 too much chatter. NGC and PCGS seem to drop points fast for anything on the face. If the same chatter was on the were on the reverse they seem to be more lenient. Also wondering what is it on the reverse right eagle wing about even with the head? Or is it just a photo artifact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmoneyeagles Posted May 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Sticking with the 63 too much chatter. NGC and PCGS seem to drop points fast for anything on the face. If the same chatter was on the were on the reverse they seem to be more lenient. Also wondering what is it on the reverse right eagle wing about even with the head? Or is it just a photo artifact. Looks like wear and tear to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmoneyeagles Posted May 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Alrighty guys...Good job, I'd say MS63 Me and some of my coin buddies have discussed this coin in particular, and called it a 64... You never know what you might get... Grading is an opinion... One NGC grader might say 63, while two others say 64, and we all say 63... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marv Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 I'd say 61 or 62 max. The face is very badly banged up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmoneyeagles Posted May 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 I'd say 61 or 62 max. The face is very badly banged up. Really the face isn't that bad... I don't think that is why it got a 63....I think the reverse had every reason to do with it not getting a 64. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Stilson Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 One thing too photo's and the light needed seem to show off any kind of hit on a coin. Just wondering since no one said anything about it. How many people wondered about the coin I posted and spot on the obverse by the hair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmoneyeagles Posted May 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 Just wondering since no one said anything about it. How many people wondered about the coin I posted and spot on the obverse by the hair. Takes away from the coin that is for sure... What is the spot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Stilson Posted May 7, 2009 Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 Takes away from the coin that is for sure...What is the spot? That actually adds to the coin. At least for error collectors. It does not add or subtract from the grade since its as from the mint. It's a strike thru mint error. Don't know for sure what was there but it is actually pretty deep at the black spot in the coin. It's probably a grease strike thru though one of the more common strike thru errors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmoneyeagles Posted May 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 Ahhhh.... It looked greasy...LOL Looked like somebody dipped it in the fryer at McDonald's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtryka Posted May 8, 2009 Report Share Posted May 8, 2009 I say MS-63 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.