kisenish Posted October 2, 2006 Report Share Posted October 2, 2006 Dear numismatic community, I found an interesting coin to look at: http://cgi.ebay.com/10-KOPEEK-1796-VERY-RA...1QQcmdZViewItem Although the seller declares this coin to be genuine, I don't like it. Is this coin only badly cleaned but genuine or you also think it's a fake? As to me, I find traces of overstriking, especially on the value side (laurel leaves) to be coarsely counterfeited (almost carved into the coin) Greetings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEVE MOULDING Posted October 3, 2006 Report Share Posted October 3, 2006 Lettering and cipher don't match examples I know. Personally, I'd stay away but somebody may think it's worth the risk. Not me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BKB Posted October 3, 2006 Report Share Posted October 3, 2006 Lettering and cipher don't match examples I know. Personally, I'd stay away but somebody may think it's worth the risk. Not me I agree with Steve on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kisenish Posted October 3, 2006 Author Report Share Posted October 3, 2006 Thanks for your replies! I also think that is a fake, just the seller confused me by declaring this coin to be genuine, however it is not unusual on eBay now Cipher series is a dream for my collection, but I could not see any coins on the sales for a long-long time (except for novodels), but even if they would appear, the prices would be extremely high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gxseries Posted October 3, 2006 Report Share Posted October 3, 2006 Kisenish, Cipher series wouldn't be TOO expensive if you don't mind the overstruck examples of 1793 (or probably the 1794 if you are lucky?). In fact, I have given up and decided to look out for those. Of course it would be nice to have a nice set of the Cipher series, but I personally don't think I will be able to afford it any day. I must also agree that the overstruck feature is a bit unusual. The underlying image itself is not something that I know of, as well as not the usual way of how it is struck. By the way Kisenish, would you by ANY chance have the 1724 1 year type kopek? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kisenish Posted October 3, 2006 Author Report Share Posted October 3, 2006 Kisenish, Cipher series wouldn't be TOO expensive if you don't mind the overstruck examples of 1793 (or probably the 1794 if you are lucky?). In fact, I have given up and decided to look out for those. Of course it would be nice to have a nice set of the Cipher series, but I personally don't think I will be able to afford it any day. I must also agree that the overstruck feature is a bit unusual. The underlying image itself is not something that I know of, as well as not the usual way of how it is struck. By the way Kisenish, would you by ANY chance have the 1724 1 year type kopek? Hi gxseries, You're right, it's practically not possible to even see some of the cipher series examples Instead of them, I have a nice collections of 1793 overstrucks, around 7-8 pieces. I like them, since there are all unique, one cannot find two exactly the same pieces 1724 1 year type kopek is my another big dream Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RW Julian Posted October 14, 2006 Report Share Posted October 14, 2006 Dear numismatic community,I found an interesting coin to look at: http://cgi.ebay.com/10-KOPEEK-1796-VERY-RA...1QQcmdZViewItem Although the seller declares this coin to be genuine, I don't like it. Is this coin only badly cleaned but genuine or you also think it's a fake? As to me, I find traces of overstriking, especially on the value side (laurel leaves) to be coarsely counterfeited (almost carved into the coin) Greetings After seeing the following: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...em=320017303007 I think it can now be safely assumed that both pieces are bad. It also seems likely that the two sellers are the same person. What are the odds of the same person in Ireland having virtually identical coins (from the same dies) for sale on eBay at about the same time? RWJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCO Posted October 14, 2006 Report Share Posted October 14, 2006 After seeing the following: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...em=320017303007 I think it can now be safely assumed that both pieces are bad. It also seems likely that the two sellers are the same person. What are the odds of the same person in Ireland having virtually identical coins (from the same dies) for sale on eBay at about the same time? RWJ Both coins are crude fakes. Makers of these "items" use acids and other chemicals and techniques to speed up corrosion and make "coins" look old and natural. WCO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.