Jump to content
CoinPeople.com

Impossible coin - 5kop1781СПМ - but NOT a NOVODEL


sigistenz

Recommended Posts

5kop1781spm.jpg

 

The 5kop1781СПМ is only known as a novodel. An expert oldtimer who has been 40-50 years in Russian coins sent me the (poor cellphone) pictures of this coin of his.

These are not the novodel dies.

The novodels were not overstrikes.

And they did not circulate.

:( What do the experts make out of this?

Thank you, Sigi

 

-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My first thought would be an altered date. The 1 digits dont seem quite the same in this photo.

 

Have you seen the coin in person?

The 1781 novodels have a visibly recut date (1781/8). With the coin shown above no alteration is visible. Yes, he showed me the coin abt. 10-15 years ago but then I was not yet specialized in the series. Not being extremely fine or AU, I gave it no second glance.

Sigi

 

-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This reminded me that I had a similarly amazing picture for Sigi. Found it on some russian forum:

img289ek.jpg

img288r.jpg

Thank you for showing - this die combination coin exists. Wolmar 2012 catalog values it $3500/XF. But at an auction it could fetch much more.

Sigi

 

-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just me or is there an odd discoloration right around the last digit?

 

hard tell, without a better pic. that might be some undercoin. what is in that spot, eagles wing or shoulder area i would guess?

 

I think you should buy it none the less, Sigi, just to have a closer look and solve the puzzle!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well...my Gorny's from that time are all buried in storage beneath crates of other catalogs which keep arriving and piling up :lol:

I'd guess Sale 27, from 1984, but I could be wrong. If anyone has a copy handy, please take a look.

Hi Steve, congrats! Gorny was right, but it was Gorny 109 of April 2001. See scan below. I think the coin did not sell then, but will make sure.

As the "7" of 1781 differs, these are not the novodel dies. Note that the 1781 novodel has a recut date (1781/8), maybe the funny first 8 is also recut? As has been questioned before, what was the reason to recut a novodel's date BACK to a year where no business coins exist? Or - maybe there were very, very few business 5kop1781СПМ struck, some important collector got aware and wanted it? It could be an explantion for this strange novodel? This question would maybe best be posed in a Russian forum, where many experts participate. But my Russian is not sufficient. -Sigi-

5kop1781spm2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Steve, congrats! Gorny was right, it was Gorny 109 of April 2001. See scan below. I think the coin did not sell then, but will make sure.

 

Good job Sigi!

 

Same coin. Indeed, it did not sell in Gorny 109. From the images and the fact that it didn't sell after buyers got to see it first hand means I'd say altered date with 99.9% probability.

 

:yes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good job Sigi!

 

Same coin. Indeed, it did not sell in Gorny 109. From the images and the fact that it didn't sell after buyers got to see it first hand means I'd say altered date with 99.9% probability.

 

:yes:

That was 11 years ago, the market was not yet as transparent (no internet viewing around the world). As the novodels were struck with altered dies (1781/?8), why not a previous business strike with altered dies? To make this broad 1 out of an 8 on the coin seems pretty difficult.

Another question is Josh's: Why a 1781SPM novodel? Back dated from 1788. Out of the blue? Or to satisfy some important collectioner's wish, who had heard of a 5kop1781SPM? This is a fascinating thing. Let's see what the Russian forums have to say. Thank you, Steve, best, Sigi :art:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. Schubert (Page 211) lists it as 780.f, and cites the Schubert, Krug and Troszczinski collections as having one. May be the novodel, can't tell.

 

BTW I have some very nice images of the Novodel. Clearly the last digit used to be an 8.

Will try to post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chaudoir (1837) #1728. Missing in Lyubomudrov (1897)

 

Hmmm...Ilyin and Tolstoi (1910) list

 

1781 CPM 5K Novodel (5 Roubles) (Edge-0)

1781 CPM 5K Original (10 Roubles) (Edge-5)

 

in the text, but show both as Novodels in the tables in the same book. Their 'original' symbol may be a typo as Novodels I've seen have edge 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...