RARENUM 0 Posted January 6, 2007 Report Share Posted January 6, 2007 Interesting coin from my collection.Grivennik 1756 no m/m/ Unlisted. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BKB 0 Posted January 6, 2007 Report Share Posted January 6, 2007 nice coin, but very bad picture. I would post a better picture, before specialists start claiming that the mintmark was abrasively removed and the quality of the picture is designed to cover it up. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RARENUM 0 Posted January 6, 2007 Author Report Share Posted January 6, 2007 I hope this image is better. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
banivechi 0 Posted January 6, 2007 Report Share Posted January 6, 2007 56 from 1756 looks like an overdate over 47. And then the problem is solved: 1747 grivennik has no mintmark (Uzd. 0814). Maybe some old dies were updated in 1756... BTW: extremely sharp details on coin!!! I like it! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
grivna1726 0 Posted January 6, 2007 Report Share Posted January 6, 2007 Interesting coin from my collection.Grivennik 1756 no m/m/ Unlisted. For a moment, you had me confused because these are normally struck without mintmark. Then I realized that it was the mintmaster's initials which were missing from the cartouche on the reverse. Neat coin and I assume very rare, because it is missing from every reference I checked. Also, I see some repunched characters and the overdate, apparently 1756/55 and it's in nice shape to boot. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gxseries 0 Posted January 6, 2007 Report Share Posted January 6, 2007 Wow! Nice coin and an unusual year overdate Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RARENUM 0 Posted January 7, 2007 Author Report Share Posted January 7, 2007 For a moment, you had me confused because these are normally struck without mintmark. Then I realized that it was the mintmaster's initials which were missing from the cartouche on the reverse. Neat coin and I assume very rare, because it is missing from every reference I checked. Also, I see some repunched characters and the overdate, apparently 1756/55 and it's in nice shape to boot. Thank You.Coin never listed before. Only one exist in my knowledge . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RARENUM 0 Posted January 7, 2007 Author Report Share Posted January 7, 2007 My question is, if some body have see coin in reference of 19th or 20th century. Thank You. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.