extant4cell Posted March 27, 2013 Report Share Posted March 27, 2013 1788 5 Kopecks - your oppinion? EM/AM? Sorry, photos original seller's photos. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
extant4cell Posted March 27, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 27, 2013 Silly question - it is EM... but it is an overstrike of some sort? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gxseries Posted March 27, 2013 Report Share Posted March 27, 2013 I think it's just double struck from EM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sigistenz Posted March 27, 2013 Report Share Posted March 27, 2013 I think it's just double struck from EM. Yes, I have a similar one of the same date and mint. Note the E on the eagle's tail and also (less distinct) the 88 in the "II" of the cypher. Sigi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EugeneG Posted March 28, 2013 Report Share Posted March 28, 2013 It's EM. This coin simply can not be AM, because Anninsky Mint had started working in 1789 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
extant4cell Posted March 28, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 28, 2013 Thank you I see what you mean! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.