BKB Posted March 23, 2010 Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 But --- how to explain the relatively frequent appearance of the 1766 (with only 1/10 of the mintage of what is listed for all the other years) ? Also the price of the 1766 is generally lower than 1767 - do you agree ? This is to say that the early mintage figures cannot be trusted. In 1767 there were minted coins without m/m and those with m/m. The mintage of separate varieties is not listed anywhere to my knowledge. Only 1767 without m/m is somewhat scarce/rare. The KM version is not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one-kuna Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 ... This is to say that the early mintage figures cannot be trusted. it seems to me that mintage figures from Baron Shoduar 3 volume book were taken by others catalogers including modern and never have been checked in if true i was wondering where Baron found these figures so we all now in big confuse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sigistenz Posted April 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 2, 2010 In 1767 there were minted coins without m/m and those with m/m. The mintage of separate varieties is not listed anywhere to my knowledge. Only 1767 without m/m is somewhat scarce/rare. The KM version is not. 1767KM taken as a whole you mean. But 1767KM splits up into edge 1 ///////////(=Bitkin 1016) and edge 6 \\\\\\\\\\\(=Bitkin 1017-R-). And the latter is rarely if ever seen. Much much less than the 1767-- no mintmark. Brekke, Aalborg (the 4 Copenhangen sales) and Bakken all cared for variants, they all had the 1767-- and the 1767KM///// but not the 1767KM\\\\\\ Sigi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nordic gold Posted April 23, 2010 Report Share Posted April 23, 2010 For a number of years I have been looking for what in most sources is believed to be a common coin - 3 kopecks 1907. The best of collections have it, but in real life I have never seen a specimen, not one. This of course may be a co-incidence, but would be interesting to hear the opinion of other coinpeople members on this theme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BKB Posted April 23, 2010 Report Share Posted April 23, 2010 For a number of years I have been looking for what in most sources is believed to be a common coin - 3 kopecks 1907. The best of collections have it, but in real life I have never seen a specimen, not one. This of course may be a co-incidence, but would be interesting to hear the opinion of other coinpeople members on this theme. I know absolutely nothing about this series. I have a bag of this stuff. If I see one I will let you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.