bobh Posted January 5, 2007 Report Share Posted January 5, 2007 L I N K The date looks a little strange (especially the shape of the "8") ... what do you think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gxseries Posted January 5, 2007 Report Share Posted January 5, 2007 This is what I have for a 10 kopek: Don't see something unusual here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RW Julian Posted January 5, 2007 Report Share Posted January 5, 2007 L I N K The date looks a little strange (especially the shape of the "8") ... what do you think? Here is another 1837 EM FX 10 kopecks: http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/8100/1837emfxne9.jpg RWJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCO Posted January 5, 2007 Report Share Posted January 5, 2007 L I N K The date looks a little strange (especially the shape of the "8") ... what do you think? Just corroded piece with "doctoring" (dissolved by chemicals and therefore porous and unattractive surfaces). Looks unnatural therefore but is authentic. WCO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RW Julian Posted January 5, 2007 Report Share Posted January 5, 2007 This is what I have for a 10 kopek: Don't see something unusual here. There is an interesting variety of the 1834 EM 10 kopecks, as follows (note the claws on the right): RWJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gxseries Posted January 8, 2007 Report Share Posted January 8, 2007 These two pictures are from my 10 1834 10 kopeks (these are getting unusually difficult to find?) : Definately doesn't look like the unusual variety there. Thanks for the picture Julian. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.