Davide Posted July 28, 2008 Report Share Posted July 28, 2008 Weight is 11,15 (instead 9,10) grms. - Diameter 28 (instead 30) mm. Obviously the thickness is greater regarding regular pieces. Someone of you know if these parameters are in normality range (weight sure, but diameter is strange)? <img src=http://images3.fotoalbum.alice.it/v/www1-3//110/110398/178211/2k1835cmD28mm1-vi.jpg> <img src=http://images5.fotoalbum.alice.it/v/www1-5//110/110398/178211/2k1835cmR1115gr-vi.jpg> Thank You David Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davide Posted July 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2008 Spiacente, I had forgotten HTLM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gxseries Posted July 28, 2008 Report Share Posted July 28, 2008 Yes, it looks perfectly fine No reason of why it would be counterfeited as it's a rather "common" coin. That said I don't have any CM coins of that era. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexbq2 Posted July 29, 2008 Report Share Posted July 29, 2008 Well CM coins for this and other series are usually considered to be harder to find than EM ones. Ilyen (or Ilyin) appraises most wings down CM coppers at 1 rouble, exception - 10 kopeeks are plain rare. Given that I must note that from my experience, for reasons I do not comprehend, finding an EM wings down 2 kopeeks in an acceptable grade is harder then an CM one?! Most of the EM 2 kopeeks that show up on eBay are completely corroded or worn down to the bone I'm sure that most people here can show an EM in a perfect XF with plentiful luster or better, I'm just saying that enmasse VF or VF- for this type is by far not a common grade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.