Jump to content
CoinPeople.com

see323

Members
  • Posts

    1,065
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by see323

  1. It is too bad you missed the last digit. Some day it may show up.

     

    I bleive that the RBNZ releases these sets almost yearly. The problem is getting on the list. I have the 1992 set, but I have seen 1994, 2003 and a 2006.

     

    I noticed a NZ collector has the 000555 set. Anyway, it does not matter. My main collection is solid 5s.

     

    Maybe you can check with RBNZ.

  2. See, how you able to pair serial numbers across denominations so easily?

     

    This New Zealand first prefix numbered set was released by RBNZ. It's limited to 1000 sets. I only bought it recently. Unfortunately, I missed one digit in the serial number. It would have been nicer if it is 000555. Much more closer to my collection theme. Anyway, it is still a good set to keep and enjoy. MMMM also has a set which he posted it earlier in this animal collecting theme topic.

  3. One of the hardest notes for me to scan.... and the colors are still off. My scanner needs to be replaced I think. The area from teh date to the womans legs on front should be a blue to red-brown transition, and the notes background should be more green, but no matter how I set or try to change later, the image is off in color. ANyhow, it's close enough.

     

    I see that BanknoteBank.com is still not quite up to it's old standard yet. It seems to me that the photo/scan size is set to that of the OmniCoin site instead of the older BanknoteBank size. Images I submit are all cropped at top, even when I submit in the 300x300pixel format.

     

    qoyviw.jpg

     

    I always love notes from Congo. This is a nice one.

    Beware of new scanner. They have built-in intelligence to detect modern currency making it impossible to scan them.

  4. Not only is it a colour variation, but also the plates are different and you can see the differences in the details you highlighted, there is enough of a difference that suspicions would be raised about counterfeits.

     

    Now the next question I wanted to ask is why did Malaysia uses two printers to print the same note on the same series. Any particular reason. Why didn't they use the same plate to print the notes ? Upon further examination, I realised that they even have different watermarks. The TDLR one has a small and slimmer Agung face. The BA Banknote one look very much like the Agung Portrait appearing on the banknote. Here is a list of prefixes taken from K.N. Boon catalog. As I am not familiar with Malaysian notes, I will need to seek Malaysian collectors' opinions. As what Saor Alba, it may even be a counterfeit. I am not ruling that out.

     

    6thSeries50watermark.jpg

    6thSeries50catalog.jpg

  5. Malaysia 6th Series $50 solid 555555 pair with different printers - BA Banknote and TDLR. BA Banknote printer is the scarce printer.

     

    Malaysia6thSeries50diffprinterssoli.jpg

    Malaysia6thSeries50diffprinterss-2.jpg

     

     

    Interestingly, if you look at the close-up on the reverse, you notice some differences in the engraved design.

    No two engravers will be able to produce the exact design. I believe both printers uses their own engravings to print the notes.

     

    Malaysia6thSeries50diffprinterss-1.jpg

  6. A long forgotten low serial piece from 1941. Bought it a few years ago from an Indian seller. The note look tanned. Not sure how it was kept but still look very good especially the serial number. These Malayan notes with low serial number are scarce and very popular among advance collectors.

     

    Malaya19415000117-F-1000.jpg

    Malaya19415000117-B-1000.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...