Jump to content
CoinPeople.com

Tane

Members
  • Posts

    584
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Tane

  1. Paris was quite logical choice, France and Russia were allies and they had good minting technologies. About Brussels I say nothing.

     

    I think that is one of the reasons to mint coins in Osaka was the geography. ;)

    It sure must have been easier to transport coins from Osaka to Siberia than from Petrograd to Siberia. Coins of Osaka must have to be intended to circulate in eastern Russia. The train system was used in other purposes during the war.

    And since Japan was now an ally, why not?

     

    Only my theory though... :ninja:

  2. I'm afraid I have no facts about it, only assumings, but I think it has something to do with insufficient capacity of the mint of the SPB. There was apparently a huge need for new coins since they made them a lot in all the three places.

     

    Some copper coins of the same period are known to be made in Birmingham too, but they can't really be distinguished from the russian ones.

  3. 900657.jpg

     

    A commemorative medal for the Romanov Dynasty tercentennary. It was given to officials all over the Empire in 1913. The commemorative coin above was modeled after this medal. There are many varieties of it, forgeries and private made ones are quite common too.

     

    On the obverse, which is quite similar to the commemorative rouble, are the first and the last tsars Mihail I and Nicholas II, and on the reverse the following text:

     

    BЪ ПAMЯTb

    300- ЛETIЯ

    ЦAPCTBOBAHIЯ

    ДOMA POMAHOBЫXЪ

    1613-1913

     

    Very rough translation is "For the 300 years of tsarhood of the House of Romanov 1613-1913".

×
×
  • Create New...