Jump to content
CoinPeople.com

Dave

Members
  • Posts

    1,517
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dave

  1. I've seen a huge increase in the amount of fantasy notes offered online in auctions and regular seller sites. These notes are not only those issued for Antarctica, Hutt river, etc., but are notes that are seemingly created for a completely fictional place and offered for sale to collectors. While I have no interest in these notes myself, the designs on some of them are quite nice, and I can understand if someone wants to collect them.

    It's the sheer volume that seems to be offered is something that perks my interest most, though. Are there really that many people out there buying these that make it worthwhile to sellers to stock these fantasy notes? If so I wonder how it will evolve - such as will there be price guides, groups for fantasy notes, etc.

    As part of this, I've noticed that there are quite a lot of "Reproductions" of US notes being offered as well. While these may be a nice 'filler' until a real one can be obtained, the money asked for them is, in my opinion, a little much - even for a quality reproduction of a note.

    Anyone have other thoughts on this?

  2. Don't know about an error or not. The earlier notes were so ornate, maybe in the redesign they never noticed it due to the amount of design that was cut out. I looked on an earlier note and couldn't see a (prominent) crescent and star myself. I'm sure I missed it somewhere.

  3. Well I wasn't expecting this for at least another week, but this came in today. Must've skipped through customs and their usual week long delay.

    This is Spain 1 Peseta from 1940. Despite the depictions of these notes, they are quite small. This one measures at 3 7/8 inches long by 2 inches high. This completes the set I was collecting of notes depicting Columbus that Spain issued in the 1940's.

     

     

    nm1c74.jpg

  4. I got this one in the mail today for my type set (bought off eBay). Pretty cool legend on the back which states:

     

    This note is a legal tender at its face value in payment of all debts public and private except when otherwise expressly stipulated in the contract

     

    936691A.jpg

     

    936691B.jpg

     

    An awesome note! Congrats!

     

  5. Nice note Dave, Do you now have all the "Experimentals"? Also, I think they were testing the paper on that version, do see any difference compared to other notes durring that time?

    I qdont have ALL the experimentals, but I do have the R ans S ones. I might go for the ores at some point, but for now I'm going to focus on a couple other areas. As for a difference - well my first impression of the S was that there was nothing discernible. And that was to be expected, as the whole experiment was evidently unconclusive (I haven't found anything to state what the REAL differences were in the first place) .. But when I got the R not I was at first thinking it was a bit thinner. I at first dismissed this as it is a VF grade (sold as VF-xf) while my S is a Au-unc. I will try to get some time this evening to better compare them side by side.

     

     

    Okay so I took another look at them both tonight, side by side .... While I first thought that the R was thinner than the S, I was wrong, and the notes, aside from being in different grades, have otherwise the same texture, feel, and thickness - as far as I am able to tell, anyway.

  6. Are there more experimentals other than the R and S? I must know!

     

    There are - I don't have my book in front of me, but as I remember there are the 1928A and B series with the Y-B block (Y: prefix and B: suffix of the serial numbers) and the 1928A series (B too?) Z-B block. Then the 1935 series A-B Block. I believe all the Web Press notes are considered experimental notes. I'm sure I'm forgetting something.

  7. Nice note Dave, Do you now have all the "Experimentals"? Also, I think they were testing the paper on that version, do see any difference compared to other notes durring that time?

     

     

    I qdont have ALL the experimentals, but I do have the R ans S ones. I might go for the ores at some point, but for now I'm going to focus on a couple other areas. As for a difference - well my first impression of the S was that there was nothing discernible. And that was to be expected, as the whole experiment was evidently unconclusive (I haven't found anything to state what the REAL differences were in the first place) .. But when I got the R not I was at first thinking it was a bit thinner. I at first dismissed this as it is a VF grade (sold as VF-xf) while my S is a Au-unc. I will try to get some time this evening to better compare them side by side.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...