Hey everyone! I’ve been really diving into my Jefferson Nickel collection over the past few years and I’ve started to notice quite a bit of discussion around the Full Steps (FS) designation. I recently stumbled upon a 1953 FS that I’d love to share with you all, but it got me thinking about how much value collectors place on Full Steps versus non-Full Steps coins.
From my experience, it seems like the FS designation can really elevate the desirability and market value of a coin. I’ve done some research and noticed that many collectors blindly go for FS coins while not considering toned, higher-grade non-FS nickels which can sometimes be just as eye-catching. I personally believe both types have their charm, but I’m curious if you guys think the hype around FS nickels is warranted or if it’s more about rarity and condition overall?
What are your thoughts on the Full Steps designation? Is it worth the premium? Have you found any non-FS nickels that are undervalued but truly stunning? I’d love to hear your insights and experiences.
Great topic, CoinCollectorJoe! The Full Steps (FS) designation is definitely an area of contention amongst collectors. From my experience, FS nickels are not just about the premium; they signify a certain level of craftsmanship and attention to detail, particularly when you consider the minting processes of the 1950s. The 1953 FS you mentioned is especially interesting due to its relatively low mintage. In general, I find that collectors often gravitate towards FS because it can indicate a coin that’s been well-preserved.
- I do think it’s worth noting that not all non-FS coins are created equal.
- A nicely toned non-FS nickel can be just as compelling and sometimes undervalued.
- Rarity and market trends play a huge role in desirability too.
Have you thought about getting your FS coin graded at NGC or PCGS? That might help clarify its value in comparison to others!
12 Likes
Thanks for your insights! I completely agree that the minting process affected the quality. I’ve been curious about grading—do you think it’s essential for each coin in my collection? Or should I focus primarily on the rare pieces?
5 Likes
I think there’s definitely a hype around Full Steps that might overshadow some beautiful non-FS coins. For instance, I recently bought a 1941 non-FS that’s absolutely gorgeous, with stunning toning. I paid far less than what an FS would cost, but I appreciate its uniqueness just the same. If the coin speaks to you, that’s what matters most! @CoinCollectorJoe, are you leaning towards FS for valuation or just personal preference?
8 Likes
Great point! I do think the aesthetics are what draws me in the most. I’ve come to appreciate the history behind each coin, whether it’s FS or not. But I can’t deny the allure of having a solid FS in my collection for potential resale value. Sometimes it feels like a balancing act! Anyone else feeling that way?
3 Likes
Full Steps are definitely a sought-after feature, but I think it’s sometimes overemphasized. There are many non-FS Jefferson Nickels that tell their own stories and often can be found at better prices. The market is tough to predict! I’ve seen auctions where a non-FS coin in great condition goes for just as much, if not more, than some FS coins. Also, those PCGS holders really help showcase the beautiful details of non-FS coins.
7 Likes
Exactly! I think a lot of new collectors get caught up in the FS hype. The beauty of the coin should always be prioritized! It’s like looking for a unicorn when there are so many other gorgeous options out there.
5 Likes
I think grading can be important depending on where you see your collection going. If you’re looking to invest, I highly recommend getting the valuable pieces graded. Non-FS coins can have remarkable features that deserve to be recognized. But for a personal collection, enjoy those beautifully toned nickels without the stress of grading! @CoinCollectorJoe, do you have a plan for your collection in terms of selling in the future?
6 Likes
I agree with @OldTimeCollector! Grading is super important if you plan to sell. I had a beautiful non-FS nickel that I was convinced was pristine, but it graded lower than I expected, which was a harsh lesson. Have you decided on a grading company yet, @CoinCollectorJoe?
8 Likes
Hey ChrisCoins, I’m leaning toward NGC because I’ve heard they have good service and reputation. Have you had any experiences with grading companies that you’d recommend?
4 Likes
Don’t forget the historical value as well! Nickels are often overlooked, but they have fascinating stories and collections. Some non-FS nickels from the late 40s to early 50s celebrate key moments in U.S. history. I appreciate both the FS and non-FS coins for what they represent. Has anyone else considered the historical context of their coins?
6 Likes
Exactly! Every coin has a story, and I love exploring that history. I once read about how some nickels were made with silver for a short time during WWII. It’s intriguing what they represent. @CollectingKing, do you have any favorite non-FS stories?
5 Likes