Hey fellow collectors! I recently dived deep into the fascinating world of the 1937-D 3-legged Buffalo nickel and have seen a ton of chatter about its various types. While doing some research, I picked up a couple of pieces with distinctly different wear patterns, and that’s what piqued my curiosity. I’m finding it a bit tricky to differentiate between the Norseman and the more commonly accepted varieties, especially given how subjective condition can be.
From my research, I noticed that the location of the missing leg and the wear on the coin seems to really play a big role in identifying the specific type. My own piece has a noticeable absence of the right rear leg, but I’m not sure how to classify it accurately. A couple of the ones I’ve read about seem to be rarer due to mint errors, while others might just reflect a rough life. Has anyone here had experience with these varieties? What are your thoughts on the best ways to attribute them beyond just looking at the leg?
I’d love to hear your insights! How do you personally differentiate between these varieties, and are there any resources or guides you’d recommend for someone trying to get to grips with the nuances? Let’s share our thoughts and knowledge—it’s always fun when we can learn from each other in the community!
That’s a great topic, CoinEnthusiast89! The 1937-D 3-legged Buffalo nickel is definitely one of the most intriguing varieties out there. To properly attribute them, you first want to look at the location of the missing leg. Generally, the type that’s missing the right rear leg is attributed as the ‘Norseman’ variety, while the more common type shows signs of wear which can mislead collectors. Grade, condition, and the die variety can also impact the identification process. I recommend using references like the PCGS CoinFacts to help you with specific details. Also, don’t forget to check for any signs of previous cleaning, as this could affect the value significantly!
7 Likes
Thanks for the insights, BuffaloNickelFan! I’ll definitely check out the link you shared. It’s interesting how many factors can contribute to attributing these coins. Mint error vs. just wear patterns is such a thin line!
3 Likes
Hey everyone! I’ve always found that the grading scale really helps with identification. When grading a 1937-D 3-leg, I use the NGC grading guide—it’s super helpful! The condition of the coin will really influence its value. If you’re ever unsure, always consult a licensed appraiser who specializes in variety coins. Plus, joining local coin clubs can provide great networking opportunities for insights and shared experiences.
5 Likes
Great point, CoinHunter77! Grading does simplify things quite a bit. I’m hoping to attend a local coin show soon to see if I can find out more from experienced collectors.
2 Likes
Interesting discussion! I’ve collected various Buffalo nickels, and for the 1937-D 3-legged variety, one big tip is to look for any clash marks or irregularities on the coin’s surface. Those can hint at its history and whether it’s a mint error or just normal wear. Also, when it comes to selling or trading, potential buyers are often more interested if you have documentation or third-party grading. It’s totally worth the effort. Keep sharing those finds, everyone!
6 Likes
Haha, VintageCoinLover! I once thought my 1937-D was a rare variety until I took it to a local show and realized it was just a common wear pattern. Definitely check those clash marks! They can be deceiving. Is it just me, or do some buyers get too excited and forget about proper attribution? 
4 Likes
Great thread, everyone! Just wanted to add that when identifying the 1937-D, it helps to know the mintage numbers—the more you know about how many of each type were made, the better. For example, there are some very rare varieties that had lower mintage. I usually reference the US Mint history page for that kind of info. Keep sharing your tips!
3 Likes
Great advice, SilverSurfer999! I didn’t realize how much mintage could affect the value and rarity. Thanks for the resource links as well!
1 Like
For identification, I suggest getting yourself a good jeweler’s loupe. They are invaluable for spotting fine details on coins. It’s amazing how a little magnification can reveal different markers on the 1937-D varieties that would otherwise go unnoticed. Also remember the value can vary wildly based on the market demand and current trends—don’t just base your decisions on personal attachments! Good luck to everyone!
9 Likes
Thanks for the tip, CentsAndNickels! I’ll definitely look into getting a jeweler’s loupe. It sounds like a perfect investment for my coin collection!
1 Like
Coin variety discussions are always fun! I’ve been collecting coins for 10+ years, and I still learn something new every day! The variations in the 1937-D 3-legged are a prime example. Also, keeping your coins stored properly in capsules can prevent further wear and tear, ensuring your beautiful pieces stay protected. Anyone have additional storage tips?
4 Likes
@CollectorMike23, I totally get that! The excitement can sometimes cloud our judgment. Anyone else have funny stories about misattributing a coin? I’d love to hear more and learn from others’ experiences!
2 Likes