Discussion: Is the 1955 DDO Overrated in Popular Coin Collecting Circles?

Hey fellow collectors! I’ve been diving deep into the world of error coins recently, and I found myself pondering the infamous 1955 Double Die Obverse (DDO). I remember the first time I stumbled upon one in a local shop, the excitement was palpable! But as I’ve dug deeper into forums and coin shows, I’m starting to feel like it might be a bit overrated for what it is.

Don’t get me wrong—the striking detail and the historical significance are fascinating! But I’ve seen so many collectors obsessed with the 1955 DDO to the point where it feels like it overshadows other equally interesting coins. The condition of my DDO is AU55, with some light wear but enough luster remaining to catch the eye. Has anyone else noticed this trend? I’ve also read articles suggesting that certain mint marks are gaining more attention for their rarity, like the 1944 steel cent.

So, what do you all think? Are we putting too much hype around the 1955 DDO? Has it come to dominate discussions and overshadow other treasures? I’d love to hear your thoughts and experiences!

I completely understand your sentiments, @CoinEnthusiast99! The 1955 DDO certainly has a storied legacy, but I often hear collectors raving about it to an almost excessive extent. Sure, the detail is striking and the error is significant, but consider this:

  • Rarity: While the 1955 DDO is rare, many other error coins have unique features that are less appreciated.
  • Market Trend: The hype surrounding the DDO has inflated its prices, which can be misleading for newer collectors.
  • Other Notable Coins: Just like you pointed out, other mint marks, like the 1944 steel cent, might be undervalued.

I would argue that diversity in collecting should be celebrated instead of fixating on a single desired piece. Have you had a chance to explore rarer mint marks? It could open up an exciting new avenue for you!

5 Likes

Exactly, CoinExpertGuy! I’ve seen so many new collectors jump straight for the DDO just because of its reputation. However, it’s worth noting that the 1955 DDO was never meant to be the star of the show. Consider the 1937 DDO Buffalo Nickel—it has its own quirks and can be extremely rare depending on the grade!
Plus, as we venture into new patterns and series, there are going to be more hidden gems that deserve our attention. By the way, @CoinEnthusiast99, how do you feel about branching out into coins like the 1909-S V.D.B. if you’re looking for something equally significant?

6 Likes

Thanks for the insights, @CollectorChick! I definitely agree—there’s a whole world beyond just the 1955 DDO. The 1909-S V.D.B. is a beautiful coin, and its history is so rich! I think I’ll start looking for interesting gems like that.

3 Likes

To be honest, the 1955 DDO is definitely overrated! I’ve owned a couple, and while they’re lovely to look at, I think the hype can deter collectors from finding true treasures like the older proofs. The price spike over the years has really changed how people view them. It used to be you could nab a decent example without breaking the bank. Now, it’s like they’re Status Symbols for collectors!
I feel like collectors would be better off mixing in some more variety. Check out PCGS for some interesting insights into other coins that are undervalued.

4 Likes

It’s funny, I literally joked to my friend last week that owning a DDO is like having a designer handbag—everyone wants it but you end up missing out on the unique finds! My favorite error is the 1972 DDO—so much detail and much less mainstream mania around it. Anyone else feel that way?

2 Likes

Couldn’t agree more, @OldCoinJunkie! The DDO has overshadowed the appreciation of some stunning pieces, particularly the 1964 SMS coins—those have incredible strike details and are often overlooked! We should be celebrating a wider array of pieces instead of allowing one coin to dominate the conversation.

7 Likes

I used to feel the same way about the DDO until I found an incredible 1963 Franklin Half Dollar last month. Talk about detail! The more I look around, the more I realize how many hidden gems there are outside of the mainstream favorites. Thanks for the push to explore, everyone!

5 Likes

1972 DDO is indeed an underdog! It doesn’t have the same following, yet the multiples in detail can be just as striking as the 1955. I think the market is starting to recognize it more. @SilverStacker22, have you looked into grading your coins? Sometimes those that have been graded can fetch higher prices!

3 Likes

Haha, I’m with you there, @MoneyMint! Most collectors start with the big names but eventually find joy in unexpected finds! I’m currently hunting for some 1916-D Mercuries. Those seem to languish in the background but tell such a fascinating story about the era. Anyone else have recommendations for overlooked coins?

4 Likes

I believe the 1955 DDO does have its place in history, but the obsession is definitely tilting the scales. The thrill of the hunt for rare finds in error coins shouldn’t begin and end with it! Old ones like the 1918/7-D Buffalo Nickel can be just as exciting if not more so! They have great stories behind them.

5 Likes