Can we talk about attribution? How do you properly attribute a coin with hairlines without compromising its value?

Hey everyone! I’ve been diving deep into the world of coin attribution lately, and I find myself grappling with a specific challenge: how to accurately attribute coins with hairlines without affecting their perceived value. I’ve recently picked up a nice 1909-S V.D.B. Lincoln penny that, while it has some noticeable hairlines, is otherwise in decent condition. I want to be transparent about its state but also avoid scaring away potential buyers or approvers at shows.

From what I’ve read, the grading community can be quite polarized on this issue. Some folks suggest classifying such coins as “Details” rather than straight grades, but isn’t there a risk of undermining its historical significance? Personally, I feel that a proper attribution should balance honesty and preservation of potential value. I’ve seen some discussions about the importance of photographic documentation alongside written attributions, which might help provide clarity.

What are your thoughts? How do you approach coins with hairlines? Do you think detailed attributions benefit or hurt a coin’s marketability? I’m really looking forward to hearing about your experiences and insights on this sticky topic!

Attribution is indeed a tricky subject! When it comes to coins with hairlines, especially something like the 1909-S V.D.B. Lincoln penny, I recommend being very clear in your attributions while still framing them in a way that emphasizes the coin’s overall appeal. I often classify coins like this as ‘Details’ but always specify the reason—like ‘hairlines’—to maintain transparency. For grading, this allows buyers to have full knowledge of what they’re purchasing without the risk of hiding flaws. You might also consider submitting high-quality photos for documentation. A good set of images can greatly influence a buyer’s perception and willingness to buy. I’ve personally found success when including a photo showing the obverse and reverse along with close-ups of the hairlines. This method keeps the discussion upfront and preferable. Anyone else seen results with this approach?

15 Likes

Great points! I completely agree that clarity in attribution is crucial. When I had a similar issue with a 1916-D Mercury dime, I made sure to provide detailed documentation, and it surprisingly sold for more than I anticipated! Documentation can truly enhance a coin’s perceived value. Maybe it plays into the buyer’s psychology, showing them you’re honest and knowledgeable about the piece’s condition. What do you think, @CoinConnoisseur97?

8 Likes

Here’s my take: If a coin’s historical significance is intact, hairlines shouldn’t deter buyers, especially if they’re indicated correctly. I appreciate your mention of balancing transparency with maintaining value, @CoinConnoisseur97. I think the key is to set the right expectations. Maybe creating an NGC account for community advice could also be beneficial?

5 Likes

Thanks for all the insights, everyone! I really appreciate the community’s perspective. @CoinExpert101, your advice on photographic documentation is excellent. I’ll definitely be taking a page from your book when I list my penny. I want to ensure there’s a full disclosure on the coin’s condition. And @RareCoinHunter, I love hearing that your documentation approach led to a successful sale! Anyone have tips on how to best photograph the hairlines without making them look worse than they are?

7 Likes

A fun tip! Try using natural light and a macro lens if you can. It helps capture the details without harsh shadows. Also, experiment with different angles. Sometimes, a slight change in angle can dramatically impact how the hairlines appear. Can’t wait to see how your penny turns out, @CoinConnoisseur97!

6 Likes

Just a thought: If you’re up-front about the hairlines and market it as a ‘charming example’ instead of a flawed coin, it might attract a different kind of collector. I’ve seen coins get snatched up because people appreciate the character that comes with age. So, maybe there’s a silver lining to attributions as well?

4 Likes

Haha! I love that! ‘Charming example’ has a nice ring to it! :joy: Sometimes, the way we describe a coin can make all the difference. You might just find that buyers are drawn to it because it has a story to tell. How did you come by your penny, @CoinConnoisseur97?

2 Likes

As a newcomer in this community, my understanding is that detailed attributions are crucial for educating new collectors while still appealing to seasoned ones. Every coin has a narrative. Maybe integrating some history behind the 1909-S V.D.B. will bolster its marketability as well. I’d love to learn about that story! Anyone willing to share?

3 Likes

The 1909-S V.D.B. has a fascinating history! This coin was part of a controversial minting process and is one of the prized pieces among Lincoln penny collectors. The V.D.B. initials on the reverse were removed soon after its release due to protests from the public about the designer’s initials on currency. So not only is it a beautiful coin, but it has significant historical value, too! Incorporating this information into your sale would definitely pique interest, @CoinConnoisseur97.

5 Likes

Wow, @HistoricalCoins! That’s some great background information! I can’t believe how much character this coin has in its story. This definitely gives me a new perspective going forward with my attribution. Thanks for the insight, everyone! Your advice has been incredibly helpful!

6 Likes