Hey fellow collectors! I recently picked up a 1942-P Type 2 coin from a local coin shop, and I can’t help but notice some inconsistencies across various listings regarding attributions. I’ve seen everything from grading disagreements to variations in mint marks that seem to baffle even the experienced collectors among us.
From what I’ve researched, the Type 2 coins can often be misidentified due to subtle differences in design elements, particularly the thickness of the numbers in the date. My coin is in a decent condition, though it has some light toning that gives it a character I really appreciate. I’m curious if anyone here has encountered similar discrepancies or has insights into how to distinguish between the various attributions effectively.
Has anyone done a deep dive into the specific designs or grading criteria? I’d love to hear your thoughts and experiences regarding the 1942-P Type 2 coins. What tips do you have for evaluating these coins accurately, and do you think this impacts their market value?
Looking forward to hearing from you all!
Great topic, CoinJunkie92! The 1942-P Type 2 coins can indeed be tricky. One of the main differences you’ll see across various listings is often due to the design nuances that distinguish the Type 1 from Type 2. The Type 2 coins generally have a thicker date which is a critical indicator. Make sure to also check the mint marks because these can often be a source of confusion among collectors. I’ve personally experienced discrepancies when I took a closer look at my collection; some of my coins were misattributed due to this small detail. Also, light toning can sometimes obscure these subtle features. If you can post a photo of your coin, maybe we can help you identify it more accurately!
For grading, I recommend checking out resources from PCGS and NGC for their guides on grading practices specific to these coins. They lay out the criteria pretty clearly and help minimize confusion.
Looking forward to more discussions on this!
3 Likes
Thanks for the informative reply, @SilverSeeker89! I hadn’t considered the thickness of the date as a distinguishing feature. I’ll definitely check the mint marks as well. I’ll try to take some good pictures and post them here so you can help me out. It’s incredible how much detail goes into identifying these coins accurately!
1 Like
Interesting point about toning! I too have a 1942-P Type 2 coin, and mine has some pretty unique toning that really makes it stand out. Toning can affect the perceived value of a coin, especially when it’s attractive. As for grading, I find that the Friedberg numbers can be useful for classification and comparison. I initially got confused due to the variances in my collection. So it’s always good to cross-reference them based on available listings. I think this adds to the charm of collecting, don’t you?
By the way, do you guys think that the differences in attributions significantly affect market value these days, or is it mostly about the collector’s personal preference?
2 Likes
@NumismaticNerd67, I think the impact on market value can be quite significant. While personal preference plays a role, coins that are misattributed might sell for less simply because buyers are hesitant without clear identifiers. It becomes a challenge for both the buyer and the seller to accurately represent the coin. That’s why resources like USMint are great for doing background checks on certain coins. Just be cautious and always refer to multiple sources before buying.
1 Like
What a deep dive! I love seeing collectors discuss the finer details of coins like the 1942-P Type 2. From my experience, I’ve found that attending local coin shows and asking experts can really help clarify these differences. Sometimes it’s as simple as a tiny detail that most people overlook. Do any of you go to coin shows regularly? I find they are invaluable for making connections and learning.
2 Likes
Absolutely agree, @CoinCuriosity! Coin shows are fantastic for connecting with other collectors and experts. I’ve learned so much just from casual conversations around the tables. Plus, you often find unique coins that are not listed online. There’s something magical about physically handling a coin and seeing its details up close.
1 Like
Great discussion! I always find it interesting how subjective grading can be. There’ve been situations where I thought a coin deserved a higher grade based on its appearance, but the encapsulation and grading from the major services disagreed with me. It feels like an art form at times. If you face any inconsistencies, don’t hesitate to reach out for second opinions. Have you guys experienced similar situations?
3 Likes
@OldSchoolCollector, definitely! I had a similar experience with a 1942-P I owned. The grading service just didn’t see the potential I thought it had. Now, I focus more on learning the grading criteria myself so I can make informed decisions.
2 Likes
LOL! Grading is definitely one of those things where even the pros sometimes disagree! It’s like taking two appraisers to value a piece of art. The subjective nature can drive you nuts! Just remember, it’s all about the passion for collecting that keeps it fun. And hey, at least our hobby doesn’t require a license to collect!
5 Likes
I agree with everyone so far! The nuances in grading and attributions can be maddening but also exhilarating. Just last week, I picked up a 1942-P Type 2 at a show, and it had some really interesting design details that made it stand out. The hunt is just as rewarding as the find! Are there any other specific coins or types people think are similarly complex?
2 Likes
@CoinExplorer, I totally relate! The excitement of finding those hidden gems is what keeps me coming back! As for complexity, I think error coins often have similar issues with attributions, especially when it comes to understanding which variety you actually have. They can be a rabbit hole, but worth it for the rare finds!
1 Like