Jump to content
CoinPeople.com

Paying attention DOES help!


gxseries
 Share

Recommended Posts

While I was looking through some of the Russian coins and images that I had, there were some that I definately wasn't paying attention until I looked VERY hard. One of which was the example of the counterfeited 1830 ruble that I was fooled into.

 

Such is the example of this:

 

903396.jpg

 

1759 2k over 1755 1k over 1727 5 kopeks, which was discussed here: Link

 

Because of the extreme nature and bruteness of overstriking, years usually get wiped and it is already quite difficult to get three years on a single coin, although what is more amazing is if you can even find a mintmark under cruelty. And just a few days ago, I think I just found it - just located 15 degrees off the St. George's helmet, leftwards, there seems to be the mintmark:

 

mintmark6gb.jpg

 

This is quite undeniably the mintmark of MMD, or the Moscow Mint. I cannot help to say that I am quite overwhelmed over what I have, and I still thank Banivechi for this :lol:

 

Another coin that I wasn't paying attention to was a coin that I bought while I was still in Moscow and thought it was too expensive. I think I picked it up for 6-10 dollars but with this novelty and it's aUNC condition, I am quite happy to say that I DID bought it. ;)

 

905724.jpg

 

At first glance, you would not really notice much, but here is a larger image:

192150kcombined9av.jpg

Notice at the denomination 50 and the hammer and sickle area at the obverse. This is indeed quite clear that a die clash has occured, like what Tane has! :cry:

 

Ironically, I didn't notice this error until quite recently... which is over 3 years since I bought it... :ninja:

 

Morale of the story - do check what you have bought! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is quite undeniably the mintmark of MMD, or the Moscow Mint.

 

1755-ММД 1k. This makes sense because the 1755-57 "Eagle in Clouds" design undertype was itself an overstrike and I think that it was the overstruck examples of this type that carried a mintmark, while those struck on new blanks did not (I seem to remember reading that somewhere).

 

Good observation. You are lucky to have such an unusual coin with the 3 legible dates and a mintmark as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(increase vs. decrease in value due to mint errors)
If you include things like clipped planchets, striking through grease-filled areas, etc. then the value might even decrease depending on the severity of the error.

 

Die breaks are usually innocuous and merely curiosities. Die clashes, while never decreasing a coin's value, also seldom increase its value but are nevertheless interesting. Error collectors might pay a little more for a nice coin with a die clash.

 

Sometimes, die clashes are important in determining things like a Morgan dollar VAM variety. But most of the VAMs don't contribute much, if aything, to a coin's value, only the sought-after ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...