Guest Stujoe Posted September 27, 2005 Report Share Posted September 27, 2005 Why are so many Columbian Half Dollars so darkly toned? Was there some kind of storage or original holder that made them so dark or are they just so cheap that no one bothers to 'mess' with them? I don't think it is my imagination that a much higher percentage or EF/AU/MS Columbian halves are very darkly toned compared to other commems or other US silver for that matter. I am talking in the dark brown to black range not just a dark grey. I used to own one that was a slider and it was dark as all get out. Very fully dark brown to blackish tone on both sides. I see a lot of them like this it seems. I kind of like the look but it seems odd that so many of them that I see are like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captaincoffee Posted September 27, 2005 Report Share Posted September 27, 2005 That's why you should always wear sunscreen. Those coins will probably get skin cancer later on in life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LostDutchman Posted September 27, 2005 Report Share Posted September 27, 2005 Dark toning usually comes from things like leather pouches....A lot of these coins were simply carried in purses and change pouches because they were "Different" like the 1943 steel cents people just hung on to them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GDJMSP Posted September 27, 2005 Report Share Posted September 27, 2005 When you consider that they struck 2.5 million of them, and a large percentage were not sold but were later released into circulation after being stored for an unknown period of time - that may explain it. How & where were they stored ? I don't know for sure about the Columbian, but many of the early commems were sold in cardboard holders. It was basically a ring of cardboard with the coin pressed into a cutout and another piece of cardboard about 1/4 - 3/8 in. wide that came down over the face of the coin to hold it in place - known as tab holders. So if the coins that were sold were in these holders - and the coins that were stored were in these holders before being released into circulation - toning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rotten Rodney Posted September 27, 2005 Report Share Posted September 27, 2005 That's why you should always wear sunscreen. Those coins will probably get skin cancer later on in life. Definantly Asylum Material. . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
28Plain Posted September 29, 2005 Report Share Posted September 29, 2005 Lots of them were left in bags, from what I've read. Many were released for circulation after the exposition was done and some stayed in banks for a good while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lowell Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 Both of mine, 1892 and 1893 have the black tone you are talking about, but the 1893 only has it on the back. I figured that was from sitting in an old Whitmans folder or something. My 1892 has great detail and is MS60 in spite of the ugly toning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bustchaser Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 The major reason is simply because there is not enough difference in price between one grade and the next for the coin dealers/doctors to dip them out in pursuit of the next number. Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stujoe Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 Thanks for the replies and thoughts all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.