Sir Sisu Posted September 14, 2010 Report Share Posted September 14, 2010 Some of you know about this part of my collection. Anyhow, I finally have all of it in my possession now and have been slo-o-o-o-o-wly going through it. It's mostly 20th century stuff. Over the past weekend I went through the washington quarters, and there was a fair amount (200-300) low grade silver coins. According to the redbook, none of them are of particular interest except perhaps 1949 -even then only moderately. My question here is, for a low grade of this year (roughly G-VG), is it of value enough to put aside from the rest of the "junk" grade silver coins that I have loose in a container or should they just join the bunch? There were some nice samples, but most of those were late year 63's and 64's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saor Alba Posted September 14, 2010 Report Share Posted September 14, 2010 I wish I could say that they are worth more than the silver in them, but unfortunately unless it has an S mint on the back which gives it a bit more interest they are pretty much worth the metal in them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Sisu Posted September 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2010 I wish I could say that they are worth more than the silver in them, but unfortunately unless it has an S mint on the back which gives it a bit more interest they are pretty much worth the metal in them. Hmmm . . . my redbook edition must have some errors then. It doesn't even list a 1949-S, but shows that 1949 (no mintmark) is one of moderate value. I wonder if there are other errors that have made me do the opposite; toss aside coins that actually are of moderate collector value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.