altyn Posted August 8, 2010 Report Share Posted August 8, 2010 The number 3 looks like it was tinkered with. But the strike is smeared in this area, and all numbers are distorted, so I am not sure. Adrianov has indicated existence of 1830/29 overdates but this one does not look like it. What do you think? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one-kuna Posted August 8, 2010 Report Share Posted August 8, 2010 The number 3 looks like it was tinkered with. But the strike is smeared in this area, and all numbers are distorted, so I am not sure. Adrianov has indicated existence of 1820/29 overdates but this one does not look like it. What do you think? Thanks. should it be 1830/1829 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altyn Posted August 8, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2010 should it be 1830/1829 thanks, that was just a typo. 1830/29, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one-kuna Posted August 8, 2010 Report Share Posted August 8, 2010 thanks, that was just a typo. 1830/29, of course. should you check overdate link on coins dot su Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.