perpetualtime Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one-kuna Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 read your PM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russia_coins Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 looks original to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gxseries Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 If there's no mintmark, isn't the mintmaster or rather mintmark supposed to be MW for Warsaw, not NG? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEVE MOULDING Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 If there's no mintmark, isn't the mintmaster or rather mintmark supposed to be MW for Warsaw, not NG? No, the St Petersburg Russo-Polish coin only shows the mint master NG (Nikolai Grachev). The Warsaw issue only shows the mint MW (Mennica Warszawska). The 1835NG 10Zlot. is quite common. See my article A Study of Rarity in Imperial Russian Coins Part VIII: Poland 1816-1850 in the JRNS for more details. Best Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gxseries Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 Thanks Steve, much appreciated. I totally forgot that I had one in my collection as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perpetualtime Posted October 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 looks original to me THANKS A LOT!!! I'VE CHECKED WITH 3 EXPERTS, LIVE. ALL OF THEM SAID>>> 100% ORIGINAL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goossen Posted October 27, 2009 Report Share Posted October 27, 2009 THANKS A LOT!!!I'VE CHECKED WITH 3 EXPERTS, LIVE. ALL OF THEM SAID>>> 100% ORIGINAL. Glad to read good news! Nice purchase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.