sigistenz Posted June 19, 2008 Report Share Posted June 19, 2008 Hi, this is the last Aalborg CM 5 kopeck, would gxseries check again whether it is an overstrike or not? And would it be possible to mark the features for our better understanding? Thank you, Sigi By sigistenz By sigistenz This coin was auctioned by Thomas Høiland, Copenhagen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sigistenz Posted June 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 Dear Hisa (gxseries), maybe my last posting escaped your attention - this is the last of the 6 Aalborg collection CM 5 kopecks. Is it an overstrike, too? Thank you, Sigi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gxseries Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 Yes, I forgot to review this last coin. This coin also is an overstruck under my eyes. No rotation in this coin. Seems quite intentionally positioned as most of the overstruck I viewed rarely deviated from this spot, assuming if I'm not under some spell In the reverse picture, this also shows a pattern of stars which is viewable, let's start from the tip of the scepter, right above the left banner, at the letter "PY"tb. If you look carefully of the monogram, in particular the II, the RIGHT side of the II, there should be a digit 6 hidden there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sigistenz Posted June 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 Yes, I forgot to review this last coin. This coin also is an overstruck under my eyes. No rotation in this coin. Seems quite intentionally positioned as most of the overstruck I viewed rarely deviated from this spot, assuming if I'm not under some spell In the reverse picture, this also shows a pattern of stars which is viewable, let's start from the tip of the scepter, right above the left banner, at the letter "PY"tb. If you look carefully of the monogram, in particular the II, the RIGHT side of the II, there should be a digit 6 hidden there. I think I see now the 6 (of the undercoin's 1762 date). But what follows the 6 is not the 2 but something like another 6??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.