corkykile Posted January 20, 2008 Report Share Posted January 20, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corkykile Posted January 20, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 20, 2008 Oops, my dialogue to go with the previous post got lost in translation. And, the 1984 did not get properly sized before I posted it. Anyway, do you think the 56d could be a 1956D-1MM-011? The 61d is one I could not find an example of for comparison. Corky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numismatic nut Posted January 20, 2008 Report Share Posted January 20, 2008 Looks like you have a coupple of rpm's but I can't tell you more than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedeadpoint Posted January 20, 2008 Report Share Posted January 20, 2008 Jeez, i've looked at thousands of cents and I've never seen anything that prominent. nice finds, corky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coppercoins Posted February 3, 2008 Report Share Posted February 3, 2008 The 1956D is 1956D-1MM-001...not 011. It's a nice RPM. The 1961D is an RPM, but I cannot tell you from that image which one it is. This one is nice too, but a much closer and clearer look is necessary to identify it. The "LIBERTY" missing the I is a simple case of a struck through grease - no premium value. The odd N on the wheat reverse is damage. The 1984D is split plating - very common for early zinc cents and not worth anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.