Jump to content

1798 polupoltinnik


Recommended Posts

But how about this one?




Looks convincing to me, but there are opinions that this is a cast.


I played with the image a bit to have a better look. Here's a link to the result:



I'm not sure if it is real or not. It seems to have a granular-looking surface and some softness in the details. This might just be some porousness, but it might also be from casting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have trouble believing that the 1755 kopek is genuine. It looks like it was cast off from a genuine overstruck 1755 kopek. The lack of details from the overstrike troubles me the most.


I think you're probably right, gx. Although it might be real, the overall appearance of the piece bothers me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Create New...