Jump to content

1798 polupoltinnik


Recommended Posts

But how about this one?




Looks convincing to me, but there are opinions that this is a cast.


I played with the image a bit to have a better look. Here's a link to the result:



I'm not sure if it is real or not. It seems to have a granular-looking surface and some softness in the details. This might just be some porousness, but it might also be from casting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have trouble believing that the 1755 kopek is genuine. It looks like it was cast off from a genuine overstruck 1755 kopek. The lack of details from the overstrike troubles me the most.


I think you're probably right, gx. Although it might be real, the overall appearance of the piece bothers me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...