bobh Posted February 26, 2007 Report Share Posted February 26, 2007 Looks innocent enough: 1771-CM, 5 kopeek? Brekke and Uzdenikov list only 1771-EM. What do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RW Julian Posted February 26, 2007 Report Share Posted February 26, 2007 Looks innocent enough: 1771-CM, 5 kopeek? Brekke and Uzdenikov list only 1771-EM. What do you think? I think this coin started out life as 1771 EM. I have seen several copper coins from this era with altered dates and mintmarks. RWJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sigistenz Posted February 27, 2007 Report Share Posted February 27, 2007 For 1771 there are no other mints than EM. The general appearance is that of 1771EM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.