Why do some collectors swear by PCGS Photograde while others prefer to use other grading references? What's your experience?

Hey fellow collectors! I’ve been diving deep into the world of coin grading lately, and it’s fascinating to see the divide between those who are devoted to PCGS Photograde and those who have their preferences for other grading references. Personally, I’ve been leaning towards PCGS because I find their images incredibly clear and the grading scale intuitive. I feel like it’s easier to spot minor details that influence the grade, which is crucial for someone like me who is always searching for high-quality specimens.

But I’ve heard some chatter about other resources like NGC’s grading guides or even online forums where collectors share their own grading experiences. I recently picked up a 1916 Mercury dime, and while I was convinced it was in fantastic shape, the discrepancies in grading references left me questioning its true value. The details are crisp, but is it truly a Gem Uncirculated (MS65) as I thought?

I’m really curious to hear what others think. Do you have a preference between PCGS and other resources? What specific experiences led you to that choice? Have you ever faced any challenges in grading coins that left you scratching your head? Let’s get the discussion rolling!

Great topic, CoinEnthusiast88! I’ve been collecting for over a decade, and I can definitely say that grading can be subjective. Personally, I lean towards PCGS Photograde because of its clarity and the detailed images they provide. I find it adds a certain level of confidence when assessing my coins. Recently, I bought an 1880-O Morgan dollar and used their guide. Comparing my coin with their images helped me pinpoint some small details that raised its grade from AU to MS63. I agree with you that the visual aspect is superb there! However, I do recognize the value of NGC’s resources; it’s just a matter of personal preference. How do you feel about using multiple references for tough calls?

5 Likes

I totally get what you’re saying, @CoinLover123! I love using PCGS Photograde too, but I have to admit, I often check NGC’s website as well. They have some fantastic resources, especially for those tricky dates or mints that can be confusing. Just yesterday, I was comparing some Peace dollars and found discrepancies that made a huge difference in their value! Have you guys ever used third-party grading services? Those can really shake things up. :sweat_smile:

3 Likes

I have to say, I’ve always relied on PCGS as well! Recently I bought a 1943 copper penny (yes, the famous one). I thought it looked pristine, but when I checked against Photograde, I noticed some faint scratches that brought it down in quality. Love that resource! But I think for newer collectors, it can be a bit overwhelming. It’s important to educate them first about coin grading. How do you guys feel about the accessibility of these resources for beginners? :thinking:

2 Likes

@CollectorJen, I totally agree! The resources can be a bit daunting for newcomers. I think a good starting point for them is to look at graded coins at local shops or shows. It gives them tangible examples to help understand the grading process better. Maybe we could compile a list of tips for beginners? What do you all think?

4 Likes

I’ve found that expert opinions also vary greatly. I took my coin to a local dealer recently, and he had a completely different take than PCGS. Frustrating, but it also made me realize that grading can be quite subjective. Perhaps we should create an unofficial flow chart to help determine which grading reference to use based on the coin type? :thinking:

1 Like

@SilverSleuth, that’s a brilliant idea! A flow chart could really help new collectors decide where to start with grading their coins. Sometimes it’s just about picking the right tool for the job. We could even include links to some guides! Would you like to help compile it?

2 Likes

Honestly, I think most of this boils down to personal taste and experience. I’ve tried PCGS, NGC, and even ANACS for different coins. What’s interesting is how different grades can add or diminish value based on which service graded them. I gravitate towards whatever service I feel understands the coins I collect best. Anyone else feel like they have a ‘relationship’ with their grading service? :joy:

3 Likes

@CryptoCoinGuy, I chuckled at your comment about a ‘relationship’ with grading services! It’s true that each experience shapes our preferences. I leaned towards PCGS originally because I had better luck selling coins graded by them; the collectors in my area prefer it. But I’d love to hear more about others’ experiences! Which service has treated you better?

4 Likes

I gotta say I have a sweet spot for NGC. I find their grading consistent, and the information they provide is super helpful. Plus, their online registry is a great tool for tracking your collection! Do you think the registry feature contributes to why some collectors prefer them over PCGS? Just my two cents!

2 Likes

PCGS has definitely set the standard in my opinion! However, I must say that I’ve had some eye-opening experiences using community resources. The forums and local club exchanges can provide insights that even top-tier grading services sometimes miss!

3 Likes

@CollectorSam, completely agree! Sometimes the collective knowledge in forums and clubs is invaluable. I recently learned something new about a rare error that was floating under the radar, thanks to a discussion in my local club. Definitely worth engaging with the community! Have you seen any recent trends in local collecting scenes?

2 Likes