one-kuna

I am back and discovered very impressive about 22,000 views for this topic !

Thank you all viewers and readers !

welcome back !

proof and MS-63 is too far away from each other

It can be a case. Was Mr. Newman aware of Russian 19th century coins in proof - I dont know. Was it him who signed these envelopes - I do not know either. From the picture of 25 kop 1827 available, this coin does not look to me being in proof. NGC might have good reasons do not grade it as a proof, and so on and on

is this book currently on web somewhere for sale?

Very nice 5 kop !

Sigi, did you receive this coin yet ? Is this an original ?

nice one

IMIS, did you see a coin in person ? Looks like too many "ifs" in your statements, also needs new better photos as well.

BTW, welcome to coinpeole !

I missed something from this story, where did you get that info, that EPN had graded his coin as proof ?

yes.

As one may think and have his/her own opinion, I would agree with Igors, that the term PROOF refers to the process by which the coins are made and not to the condition of the coin

no warranty, no claims, no NUTRAL feedback

this auction was offering a duplicates from Hermitage duplicates of yefimoks Markov wanted to sell to satisfy his expenses when purchased yefimoks from the hoard (N&E #8)

these are for super rich collectors !

nice film, thank you for showing

A lot of materials, thank you

Famous Igors ruble

by words it is 10 000 by digits is 100 000

from these pics it looks extr fine to me

maybe more identical items ?

krause is too far to learn russian coins, krause just for orientation on prices but sometimes even this a big problem for them

all russian coins are overpriced on ma-shops, who buy them ?????????

this is not Peter III

the reason I asked about this article and his author just to get a picture what pushed you to write it out

does it have a net XXXXXXXXX ?