Jump to content
CoinPeople.com

thedeadpoint

Members
  • Posts

    17,926
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by thedeadpoint

  1. Actually, it is a bit special. Very good eyes! 1982 is an important year for Lincoln cents for two reasons. The big reason is that's the year when they switched from copper coins to copper-clad zinc. I don't know the proportion, but it's about half and half. Folks who are after the copper melt value of cents hoard anything before 1982.

    The other reason 1982 is significant is because there are two date sizes. It looks like you have a large date.

     

    Check out this site for more information: https://www.cointalk.com/threads/a-guide-to-1982-lincoln-cent-identification.55647/

     

  2. I am using more cash recently. I think I even saw an article today about people using cash more often. I have two reasons for my use: 1) folks have paid me in cash for stuff in the last year and I need to use it (too lazy to go to the bank) and 2) a lot of the shops near me don't let us use plastic for less than $X. So if I wanted a small bag of chips for lunch, I need to pay cash.

  3. I haven't read into this or done any experiments myself, but I assume that it will continue to change. No kind of surface treatment (natural or artificial) is permanent. I bet even being encased in a noble gas or in a pure vacuum will alter the surface (and thus the toning) over time.

    Think of a coin's tone like a bottle of wine. Some will age gorgeously and others age less gracefully. If you try to force the process in a certain direction, you'll probably introduce an effect not intended.

×
×
  • Create New...