Jump to content
CoinPeople.com
Ornulf

Identifying 1671 Farthing Pattern

Recommended Posts

I recently found this among a bunch of low-quality farthings. Not having access to pictures of a 1671 farthing, I wonder wether the readers of this forum can lend assistance?

 

 

1671_Farthing_Pattern.jpg

1671_Farthing_Pattern_2.jpg

1671_Farthing_Pattern_3.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/brit/charles_II/i.html

 

All images & text courtesy of Wildwinds, a great site for collectors.

 

6th one down E_charlesII_P436-o.jpgE_charlesII_P436-r.jpg

 

Sale 31: The Pre-Long Beach Auction May 30 - June 1, 2005
Lot 2212Great Britain. Pattern copper Farthing, 1671. Charles II.
P-436. Listed by Peck among the "official farthings," and in fact
this is the pattern design most often seen, in silver, from this
reign. Lower grade silver coins are easily found in England, VF and
AEF pieces, but nicer silver ones are seldom found and must be
considered very rare in choice condition. However, copper specimens
are elusive, particularly this well preserved. Milk chocolate in
color, with remnants of luster adhering among the letters, the
surfaces emitting a lovely, glossy brown glow. Only tiny marks may
be seen. There are some usual, light die-flaws but these are
nothing. The king's portrait is especially appealing and well
engraved. This beautiful coin is one of the Cheshire Collector's
favorites, and we quote his comments and research here: "This great
rarity was produced before the beginning of the regular production
of farthings in 1672. Farthings were not made available to the
public until a week after the proclamation of 16 August 1672 and
Peck concludes that we should regard this 1671 farthing as 'the
final prototype of the current farthing, struck in anticipation of
the proclamation'. Listed by Peck as 'very scarce' the piece is now
seldom seen in any grade." NGC graded MS-63 Brown.
Estimated Value $1,400-1,600.
Provenance: The Cheshire Collection.
Realized $1,400

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how a pattern could become so worn.

 

Perhaps it is a 1674? It's hard to tell from these images.

 

2dt89i0.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both. I guess there is difficult to be sure. 1674 is definitively possible. To be this worn, it would have to have leaked into circulation for some reason.

 

Regards

Ornulf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion the images you provide make it look much more like a 4 than a 1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...