corkykile Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 Okay everyone, need some help here. I am asking for a consensus of whether or not this can be considered a wide A M Your input is much appreciated. Corky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roaddevil Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 doesnt look like it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedeadpoint Posted September 5, 2007 Report Share Posted September 5, 2007 they aren't touching but i dont think they are supposed to actually touch in the ''non-wide'' variety, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leethree Posted September 5, 2007 Report Share Posted September 5, 2007 Wouldn't think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corkykile Posted September 6, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 6, 2007 Guess I better keep trying. I gotta find one someday... I have so many coins for these years that there is bound to be one. I was hoping it would qualify mostly because it is in a proof set. Most of the close AM's I have seem to be actually touching... some just barely, but nonetheless touching. Best I get back to my coins and see if I can find one... just one... just one... just one Thanks for giving it your time... Corky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cherry Picker Posted September 7, 2007 Report Share Posted September 7, 2007 Guess I better keep trying. I gotta find one someday... I have so many coins for these years that there is bound to be one.I was hoping it would qualify mostly because it is in a proof set. Most of the close AM's I have seem to be actually touching... some just barely, but nonetheless touching. Best I get back to my coins and see if I can find one... just one... just one... just one Thanks for giving it your time... Corky Corky, dont forget about the close AM '92 variety.! Very Rare.!! Check out the price list. http://www.pcgs.com/prices/frame.chtml?typ...incoln_cent_mod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corkykile Posted September 15, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 15, 2007 Thanks Cherry... Will definitely keep an eye out for those. But with my luck at not finding the lesser of the two yet, I am not holding out too much hope... Corky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topher Posted September 15, 2007 Report Share Posted September 15, 2007 Now I gotta check the 93s and 92s? Holy smokes!! Next you'll want me to check EVERY Lincoln I come across! I guess I better put a Lincoln cent book on my Christmas list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corkykile Posted September 15, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 15, 2007 Now I gotta check the 93s and 92s? Holy smokes!! Next you'll want me to check EVERY Lincoln I come across! I guess I better put a Lincoln cent book on my Christmas list. Hey, you gotta believe in something and Santa Claus is the best one I can think of. 'Looking Through Lincoln Cents' by Charles Daughtrey, is a pretty good book, but it doesn't give all of what we like to discuss in our error forum. You better get started on that letter to the North Pole. Corky Never, but never, stop believing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.