Jump to content
CoinPeople.com

extant4cell

Members
  • Content Count

    1,340
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

1 Follower

About extant4cell

  • Rank
    Russian coins surfer
  • Birthday 02/06/1970

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://numistika.com

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Melbourne
  • Interests
    Imperial Russian Copper 1730-1840

Previous Fields

  • OmniCoin
    http://www.omnicoin.com/collection/extant4cell
  • BanknoteBank
    http://extant.wix.com/showcase

Recent Profile Visitors

2,256 profile views
  1. Have a Happy New Year 2020, everyone! Hope it will be the year when we'll have our interest in numismatics and collecting Russian coins well stimulated with lucky finds coming our way and time to spend on research! Best of luck, best of health and lots of love from the dear ones! πŸ‘‘ πŸ‘‘ πŸ‘‘ 🌲 🌲 🌲 πŸŽ… πŸŽ… πŸŽ…
  2. This question remains somewhat unanswered for me yet. I am reviewing 7 y. war at the moment to see what else may have happen. A couple of things are to keep in mind here, I think: 1) In 1760 Russia and Austria occupied Berlin as allies (I think there may have been even German troops involved, but I need to do more reading on that), but decided to withdraw as they hadn't had the backing secured and supplies were scarce. They made a base in another town nearby with safe supply routes, and were preparing for another attack on Berlin in 1760-1761. At that time Elizabeveta Petrovna, who were determined to have a victory, even if she had to sell some of her dresses, as she put it, passed away, and Peter III, who was Friedrich"s II admirer, signed Petersburg's peace agreement with Prussia. Russian troops were ordered to assist Friedrich II against yesterday's allies and withdraw back to Russia, even from territories of East Prussia in which citizens have sworn their loyalty to Russian crown. Including Kunigsberg, where Russia was making local currencies of Russian design in silver and smallest one in copper. Examples: This made Peter III very unpopular with Russian military and in the country. Read more on historical aspects to do with Elizabeth ROLE here: http://numistika.com/books/1900 Bain - The daughter of peter the great - Russian diplomacy and court.pdf here is an extract from It. I am yet to find the time to read it all. 2) Meanwhile, in Russia, Shuvalov is pushing for two projects to do with copper coinage. A ) converting old cannons into coins in Sestroretsk, which is approved in 1757. B ) Doubling copper coins nominal (denomination) by overstriking new type Elisaveta Petrovna 's coins and producing brand new coins. This project was rejected in 1760 and in 1761 he tried again and in 1762 Peter III pushes this project through. Now, the 1760 dies that we have one sided novodels made from, particularly, 4 kopecks, importance of which I demonstrated in the first post are here, and I now have no doubts that they are genuine. Where did they come from? My understanding is that dies were not usually ordered to be made until there was OK for the project and trial strike was ordered. Though, given the political powers of Shuvalov, rules may not exactly apply here. So, I cannot dismiss that possibility. There are two theories: - officially accepted by GM, Uzdenikov and many others, but that has no documental proof, is that dies were pre-made for Shuvalov 's project. Who, I'd assume, has chosen this design for the series as victory series, expecting to celebrate military victory over Prussia. It would also make it easier for the new areas introduced into the Russian Empire to accept this copper coinage. - Possibly, it was another project where they would try to introduce victory copper coinage of these denominations just to the new Russian territories, as was later done in Siberia. The coinage that was made in Kunigsberg had local elements mixed with Russian imperial elements. Here we have a similar idea. Frankly, the last theory is probably less likely. In any case, I would assume that armature series dies were trialled in 1760 as Victory series coinage. In 1762, though Russia didn't loose in the war, but has withdrawn from it, after paying high price in people and money spent on this war, for political reasons in the head of the new Emperor, it was taken by Russian military as sign of weakness and even treason. Even though, I do like the armature series design and take it as originally designs, I must say that releasing "victory" series in these conditions in Russia was a bit of a joke and could be taken by people as insult and a sign that new Russian Emperor has lost his marbles and now was introducing coinage in Russia with Prussian design. No wonder he was quickly replaced. In any case, the 1760 trial dies, I believe, were designed with victory in mind. But releasing it in 1762 was one piece of the chain of unfortunate events in Russia...
  3. These 2 coins in GM corpus of Russian coins are named as one sided novodels with plain edge. Uzdenikov suggested that they are made with original trial dies of 1760. This is probably true, and there is a little proof for this assumption. This is 8 Gute Groschen 1754, that I was hunting for the last 2 years, since I realized that for one or the other reason this coins was the one that partly influenced the design of 1762 Russian series of Peter III (prepared by Elizabeth in 1760). Finally, I managed to secure it and looked into this story a little further. Russian catalogues usually describe the two "lines" on the left that stick out from behind the war drum as "drumsticks". As we can see, on the Brandenburg's coin, that played as the role of a prototype model, they are no sticks. The lower one is a sword. I am not sure about the top one, may be you can help me here with your suggestion what it could be. Now, on Russian series originally were suppose to be the same military objects, as it would be logically assumed. And if we would closely examine the novodel 4 kopecks that were made, according to Uzdenikov with original 1760 dies, we could see that its image closer to 8 Gute Croschen 1754 than any other 1762 coin may have, with good traces of a sword remaining there. The remains of sword on Russian coins of this type I could see only on this coin, that is assumed made with trial dies. I couldn't see it on any other Russian coins of this type with military armature. I would assume, now, that 4 kopecks truly were of an early original design, when the master who created the die had 8 Gute Groschen 1754 in front of him, and knew exactly where this image was copied from. I'd say, this is a proof that 4 kopecks comes from the original trial dies.
  4. Looking for a coin of this type (D) to buy. https://www.kuenker.de/de/archiv/stueck/128859
  5. Sigi, your persistence and a real eagle eye for rarities often pays off 😻 with rare finds. You are an awesome 5 kopecks detective! Even if the rarities were siphoned out from this hoard left over, it is still an impressive mountain of coins. I'd love to see the actual find!!! I wonder if they could build a pyramid out of it... πŸ˜…
  6. That's how they look after staying in a clay jar for over 200 years in the ground (or rather river or lake banks' sand) and being cleaned with water. I've seen a few finds like that and many look like this. After proper cleaning some look really AMAZING! Will require a few years in the fresh cabinet after that though... but, I wouldn't by it... only a couple of coins are from Elisaveta's times... and it looks like the pile has already been picked through for rarities...
  7. Just stabled on this on Russian eBay equivalent selling at the moment at a starting price of 52 000 rub. Oh my, the rouble is seriously devaluated nowadays...
  8. Here is another denga 1730 that will join the collection soon. This one is with 2 rosettes (second one is instead of the bow). Just won it on Katz.
  9. Thank you for your evaluation, Dwight. Glad to hear you found book etc. helpful. Happy hunting for interesting coins!
  10. Hi Sigi and Dwight, There were several mints that produced these coins (mostly by overstriking). Generally, we can devide all coins into 3 categories, by main mints' tools that were used: SPM, MM and EM. Coins produced by St.Petersburg mint tools all have 3 flags and eagles of more classical Dasier shapes. Moscow and Ekateringburg tools' coins both have 2 flags, but Moscow shape eagle (with straight left wing) easily sets Moscow tools' coins apart. There are also many eagle differences in EM coins, that are easy to notice if you study Elisabeth 5 kopecks long enough. Ones you learn to devide coins into groups, you start noticing differences in styles of letter and number shapes, and can learn to recognise coins by seeing only one side of the coin. Sigi is good at that now. Bitkin is a great basic reference, but not for identifying these coins by mints.
  11. It would be interesting to see 1759 overstrike on 1 ore. As far as I know, SM stopped production of coins in 1758 (possibly due to the fire), while SPM continued overstriking into 1759 (2 kopecks), but that had nothing to do with ore overstriking. I've heard about 1 kopeck 1759 overstrike on 1 ore, but could never confirm this. Possibly this info carried on from Brekke? Question is where it got to Brekke from and are there coins to support this claim?
  12. Very nice, Sigi, and with an early 1758 CM scroll, as far as I can see on my mobile!
  13. Nice 1 kopeck! Thank you for sharing. This is one of the nicest kopecks: The 1 Ore coins were a little bit heavier and wider, so, just as with 2 kopecks made from 2 Ore, 1 Ore were cut down in size from ~31mm to ~29mm and re-edged. But "blanks" made for 2 kopecks from 2 Ore were better heated and treated (possibly pressed before that), that resulted in very few coins keeping any signs from the original "under-coins". I am not aware of other overstrikes of Swedish copper coins. Though, there were many speculations (started by Winkler and supported by Uzdenikov) that apart from large Avesta 5 kopecks of late 18th century (such as this one) : there were some earlier, smaller 5 kopecks made outside Russia, some possibly in Sweden. Here is one of such suspects: The regular strike 5 kopecks were so light that had only about 1 kopeck worth of copper in them. There was too much temptation inside and outside Russia to use this fact into someones own advantage by forging illegal copies of these coins for circulation. Later most of such coins were destroyed at the mints by melting them. Some stayed in circulation and later were overstruck into 2 kopecks. There were some regional types that were later ovestruck into regular Russian 2 kopeck coppers. For example this one ( Moldavo-valachsk coins 1771-1774 😞 Here is an overstruck example under number 21, among other overstrikes into 2 kopecks: The design of Denga coins from 1730 and to 1754 has been influenced by Swedish emergency coinage and others, same with 1755 kopecks and with 1762 armature coinage... There was also German influence, Dutch, etc, etc... in later years:
  14. Dwight, Thank you for your purchase! I am glad to see that you found this book helpful. May many interesting coins come your way!
×
×
  • Create New...