QUOTE(Tiffibunny @ Jun 5 2006, 09:34 PM)
Page 1:
Page 2:
[right][snapback]223273[/snapback][/right]
Maybe it's just because they are a novelty...
spanning 20 years with just a few issues
confused with a quarter
same reverse as a previous issue
less than flattering portrait
... I like them
But I am not crazy at Dansco with their decision on varieties - I can accept the '79 near and far date, but does the different mintmark really represent an important variety?
Anyways nice collection - glad to see you putting these (and the others up)