tabbs
May 27 2006, 10:37 PM
Let's see if this works.
tabbs
May 27 2006, 10:41 PM
No, doesn't work. Seems that thumbnails are broken. (Well, for me, that is.) The thumbnail itself displays fine, but when I click on it, I get the gibberish below.
Christian
ÿØÿàJFIFddÿÛC 2!=,.$2I@LKG@FEPZsbPUmVEFdˆemw{?‚?N`?—Œ}–s~?|ÿÛC;!!;|SFS||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||ÿÀ?N"ÿÄ ÿĵ}!1AQa"q2?‘¡#B±ÁRÑð$3br‚ %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyzƒ„…†‡ˆ‰Š’“”•–—˜™š¢£¤¥¦§¨©ª²³´µ¶·¸¹ºÂÃÄÅÆÇÈÉÊÒÓÔÕÖרÙÚáâãäåæçèéêñòóôõö÷øùúÿÄ ÿĵw!1AQaq"2?B‘¡±Á #3RðbrÑ $4á%ñ&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz‚ƒ„…†‡ˆ‰Š’“”•–—˜™š¢£¤¥¦§¨©ª²³´µ¶·¸¹ºÂÃÄÅÆÇÈÉÊÒÓÔÕÖרÙÚâãäåæçèéêòóôõö÷øùúÿÚ?ì袊(¢Š(¢Š)1KEQEQE%ÅHÈí0C$çð=•D¤¢µW,\8H›çØHàÕ]ÖŸ4ÛÉr0F1íOPí’6ÑÉ W$Õ8Yÿ²>Ñk¶2™,¡F aÏysm,mîàšub5ãÇ%š˜Ô%Ȳ’ “Ú¶P’ °ÁÇ"º#%-‰j袊¡Rg4UK?ÑH³¯!F{Uº Mjʧ²¨¯ Ê^G2F[1¸%?b;V}µôM[3:£HNöoáþu$š}ÃÊù¯³®GßúóÒ³.4{Ò’(¶|»n)ì9®Hs=Ít:+xb½šÞâ3þ?n‹ý£Ó?N+V³´Ky-ì@™63í»zûf´k¶ ÈÉî-”µb“ߥ)ªº” Ÿ<ˆpÊ„ŠMÙ +»r;šBGšä5 zifµhƒ Œaýâ§øÑu®Hú¼3"ºÇÂ0NzñY{C¥a¦uùÆy “Ï=ë?ÜßÛ†b®cÿWåãœ}=sM±ÖçŒó²;¬€Ÿ-FqŽ”{@ú´ís±àç ÐçÆiÚÍÄíˆgi|??§×éþ¶:½Å¾›t˜g=Cÿtž¹4½ ÞJçd¬eNAïNª.[J¶$Ÿ»WÅmusšK•´^ñíeYN#+ój°j¦¦¥ô뀣$¡ãð¥/…„wFfiaçXHO˜(ø—Ðûg?.¡ofšÅ´®v’@tÍc^i·†kU¸}ÃËÿtßýzÐ•Ö ?˜Ë)ヒkŠ¥n]ÔëjÉZW$e¶MPß$Lr1ƒýï_Ê–Ñ-࿞ëÉ`$ì1…õü꼆æ@>è%²Ÿ©¤IeÛ‘":ð8ö¬]Z‹Q-t¹{I·³CzFnC?áÇòëMÑ—O:mÊ¡Ì[˜9~»{~ª„‹‘ f`ÍÁ* ¶•;Cx°K€W…ÇÎkzu¹´¶£åºw‘Òh»²àÙ’¸8Ï\gŠ¿YºF‘F8#?iWdv9j|L ¨/d0ZM(•RÀ~9ª÷ÉæYN™ÆPŒŸ¥)ü,˜îc=êÜ#Ü0þ¡¢«Û§!Üüò¾”³í[]€¯á×ñ5dÀ #«Œ÷së?zòäÎÅd-¬Nœ·%³ŒžßJ‚h¾g}…Nqƒ×¯¥X$ygÊÎìü¤¿çÒ¡I~›{¶v0 œž¸àŠé„[?¼bÞºp»/FÝ2/¥XûK[¨ž ÛÓw^=;TkòܺC?ódQ?ô`'®z×?3SÐÕ$Ò¹¯ ÈÒéq;³'ÜäÖ•fh .—†a‘ÐüÆ´ëևŽjŸÒªê<é÷ÿžgùU®•Ém+2ä$?^)ÏádÇsœ¶ß%–Ù¾Veàc“þzÔQÍ'œ‰"dƒÇC×>ßZ»ªê6« ¬ñ}év_ƪ'Ĩä?÷?¼ɯg+?|®Jì°&6Ò~§Œý}ýêºMqo¼ÅŒ· “ßœÿ:wÎs¾"yê´€0û?àÿ´qQíd‘»âŒ´‡2Èq×5,ñÈ?yQ wÛœ¯SH¤BÆWl¸ïŽ•>‘¨Û™n^B7"îÜ};âŠqç‘M4®–Åïs£Å‘Üÿ3ZÕ›¡Ê'ÓüÄP?¤f ;dšÒ¯V ÉSâ`FEAv¥íf@>b„ʧ¨.²-%#®ÃÏáU-‰Žç/¨hCglñÒd,ƒ>§üMKs£Íi5§ÙŽQð?“ÐúÕ+ýZââÂÖ&VRâý7p1K©j×3C†ŒÆ¡ÆGÞo_¥r¾V¬z*5ZIùšòZ\Cw(w+ä†=¾´9þضÌp6gpéüúÖEö rúœ2ìhÌ@mCß=:WÔîN¼&òÜ0>XŒõǧõ¬ý•>ĪSüñiM©MËn?ŒnϯңÓ4ËwÉÈ_Ý©ûçùU;]Rèkͱ?ß*cxè(Òµ+¥¸ºuS#HŒìb;Ö‰ElW%Dž½‹A… ôÿ%ñ¹$e??jV/†\ɦ–s’]‰'¿s[#‘]Øá©~wqiŽ‚DeìÃ%&*š¹™›w¤[ÜÚEo·bÆAR:ÒÞi6÷fË?$ñŽãÒ´qéI?Þ§‘í%Ü£q¥ÁqwÃ(ÝoZVÓ!mEo1ó…Æ;}jæ1Ú?¸û 9s˹N=6oä»UäÇo 6ÛNŠÖæy£Ošc“è*ø¸4›xÇjN?ÞEk;HícuˆaYËíôö«cšB£‚È¥«JÊÄ·}OÿÙ
Art
May 27 2006, 10:45 PM
I can click it and view the same picture, same size, in a full IE window. I cannot enlarge or manipulate the picture in any way.
tabbs
May 27 2006, 10:54 PM
Thanks, Art. May be a Mac thing then - I tried it with three different browsers and always got the same result.
Christian
Trantor_3
May 27 2006, 11:43 PM
Nope, not a Mac thing, I get the same on a Windows PC, running Firefox:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; nl-NL; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050919 Firefox/1.0.7
Can't really remember when I started seeing this, whether it was yesterday (friday may 26th) or today (saturday may 27th). Initially thought it was due to my computer, but rebooting it didn't help.
Have rebooted several times since and I still get the same stuff when clicking an attachment.
Will try IE now.....
On IE I get to see te same picture as shown in the original post. However, I don't know what the original size of teh attachement was....
tabbs
May 28 2006, 09:04 AM
QUOTE(Trantor_3 @ May 28 2006, 01:38 AM)
Nope, not a Mac thing, I get the same on a Windows PC, running Firefox
[right][snapback]220897[/snapback][/right]
To some extent I feel relieved

but not really.
My default browser is Safari; tried this with Firefox and iCab as well, and always got this error. The size of the original image was very small, something like 5K (just used this tiny pic for testing purposes). But I get the same effect with thumbnails where the original image is larger - the only difference is that the row of odd characters will be longer ...
Christian
Sir Sisu
May 28 2006, 09:46 AM
I use Firefox on XP and have the same problem. All attatchments open a page of characters like the one you displayed above.
akdrv
May 28 2006, 12:06 PM
What format is the original full size file? Does it have an appropriate extension?
akdrv
May 28 2006, 12:07 PM
Test
tabbs
May 28 2006, 12:16 PM
QUOTE(akdrv @ May 28 2006, 02:01 PM)
What format is the original full size file? Does it have an appropriate extension?
[right][snapback]221005[/snapback][/right]
If you move the cursor across the thumbnail, you should (well, that may depend on the browser again

) get that info. In my case (post #1) it was "imgtest.jpg", size 2.29K - yours (post #9) is "av_5.jpg", size 23.74K ...
Christian
akdrv
May 28 2006, 12:24 PM
Looks like we ran out of space. I'm doing some file cleanup right now. We'll see if it helps.
akdrv
May 28 2006, 12:28 PM
Test 2
Trantor_3
May 28 2006, 02:52 PM
Krugerrand2.jpg - Size:20.11k, Downloads: 4
still gives me ascii humbug, in firefox
akdrv
May 28 2006, 03:46 PM
Well, it was not a space issue. I sent an email to the ISP. I'm sorry for this temporary fear of attachments.
tabbs
May 28 2006, 04:10 PM
QUOTE(akdrv @ May 28 2006, 05:41 PM)
Well, it was not a space issue.
[right][snapback]221029[/snapback][/right]
Thanks for trying it out anyway. Guess that, had it been space related, the IE users would have had the same problems. Ah well, cleaning up from time to time cannot hurt anyway.
Christian
akdrv
May 30 2006, 03:56 PM
I got a reply from the ISP. They upgraded the PHP version. The forum software seems to work fine with the new PHP version, except for attachments. They suggested upgrading the forum software, but I'm afraid we'll lose all customizations, like Retro skin etc. I will look into it further.
tabbs
May 30 2006, 04:57 PM
QUOTE(akdrv @ May 30 2006, 05:51 PM)
They suggested upgrading the forum software, but I'm afraid we'll lose all customizations, like Retro skin etc.
[right][snapback]221511[/snapback][/right]
That would not be great either. I don't use the retro skin but am well aware that quite a few prefer it, and who knows what "etc." means.

Now upgrading sounds like extra $$ to me ... In any case, thanks for your "investigation"!
Christian
bill
May 30 2006, 05:27 PM
I work on a Mac and have the same problem, it won't interpret the image as an image. If I drag the image to the desktop, it opens fine as a thumbnail.
GreatUncleAbe
Jun 19 2006, 03:23 PM
Hi All,
The reason the images are displaying as text is that the server is sending the wrong MIME type (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) for the content.
For web pages this should be set using the HTTP response header
Content-Type: text/html
and for (JPEG) images the HTTP response header
Content-Type: image/jpeg
The server is sending
Content-Type: text/html
for both text and images and Firefox is obeying this and displaying the images as text.
IE is being a bit naughty and not believing the MIME type, but instead inspecting the response and working out the MIME type for itself.
Translation: The web server or webapp software that handles thumbnails has become misconfigured

I'm a full time web developer and sysadmin so I should be able to fix this for you. PM me if you need any help.
Regards,
Abe
Trantor_3
Jun 19 2006, 04:23 PM
I'd love to see this fixed.
And if that's not possible without loosing other features (like e.g. retro) I'd suggest to disable the attachement feature, at least until a proper solution is found. I find it quite annoying to have to start Internet Exploder just to see an attachment.
Tiffibunny
Jun 19 2006, 05:38 PM
It's been doing that for me for quite a long time now in firefox.
akdrv
Jun 20 2006, 04:58 AM
Here is where we stand with attachments right now:
The ISP is not willing to make any changes to the server configuration and they suggest we upgrade to a newer version of the software which fixes the problem. If we upgrade, we will lose "Retro" and other important customizations I implemented over time.
I'm looking into two possible resolutions:
1. Moving to a different ISP, keeping the same software and re-doing all customizations.
2. Moving to a different ISP and using different software.
In both cases, I see a BIG PRUNING coming.
The alternative is to stay with the current software version and disable attachments.
bobbycoin
Jun 20 2006, 11:42 PM
Tiffibunny
Jun 21 2006, 12:26 AM
I don't think attachments are a big deal, we can still post pics.
Sir Sisu
Jun 21 2006, 08:51 AM
I personally never even use the thumbnail attatchments, so I do not mind if we loose it.
tabbs
Jun 21 2006, 10:51 AM
Same here. (Well, almost.) Once in a while I use(d) such thumbnails, just because it is easier to attach an image to a message than if I had to upload it to an album or website. But considering the alternatives, I would not mind seeing them go.
Christian
Art
Jun 21 2006, 12:29 PM
QUOTE(akdrv @ Jun 20 2006, 12:53 AM)
Here is where we stand with attachments right now:
The ISP is not willing to make any changes to the server configuration and they suggest we upgrade to a newer version of the software which fixes the problem. If we upgrade, we will lose "Retro" and other important customizations I implemented over time.
I'm looking into two possible resolutions:
1. Moving to a different ISP, keeping the same software and re-doing all customizations.
2. Moving to a different ISP and using different software.
In both cases, I see a BIG PRUNING coming.
The alternative is to stay with the current software version and disable attachments.
[right][snapback]227453[/snapback][/right]
PRUNING! Did he say PRUNING!!!! AAAAGH!!!
Stujoe
Jun 22 2006, 02:29 AM
A little pruning never hurt anyone.

If the new software is template based, I figure I could rebuild Retro again with the proper priveledges. Of course, not for a while do to my current situation.

I have never used the attachments myself.
izzy452
Jun 22 2006, 03:25 PM
Pruning

Oh no.
Trantor_3
Sep 11 2006, 04:51 PM
seems to be solved now, and apaprently without pruning

At least, my post count is still intact......
tabbs
Sep 11 2006, 05:09 PM
QUOTE(Trantor_3 @ Sep 11 2006, 06:46 PM) [snapback]253539[/snapback]
seems to be solved now, and apaprently without pruning

As far as I can tell, CP just started using a new IPB version (see the "Big Upgrade" notice that Anton posted). And yes, thumbnails now work again. Hooray.
Christian
Trantor_3
Sep 11 2006, 05:42 PM
knew that, been there
Trantor_3
Sep 11 2006, 06:19 PM
test 1 2 3
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.