Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Modern commemortive errors

CoinPeople.com > Main Numismatic Forums > Coin Forum
regandon
I just started collecting modern commemorative mint errors. I just got this 1992-s Columbus half graded by NGC with two die cracks. This makes my thrid commemorative error coin.

http://www.omnicoin.com/coin_view.aspx?id=911140
LostDutchman
that's pretty stinkin neat... I bet commem errors are hard to find...
regandon
The same day I bought the Columbus error half, I also got an NGC graded Civil War commem with a die crack that runs the whole lenght of the rev.
gxseries
Would die crack be considered as an error? confused1.gif

I just take it as a matter of die detoriation. But yes, if the coin is meant to be proof, I would consider as such as it is supposed to be marketed as mint packages with no defects.
Art
That's a neat area of collecting. I've never even thought about the idea that Modern Commems would be out there with die cracks like that. bthumbsup.gif
regandon
QUOTE(gxseries @ May 9 2006, 02:56 AM)
Would die crack be considered as an error? confused1.gif

I just take it as a matter of die detoriation. But yes, if the coin is meant to be proof, I would consider as such as it is supposed to be marketed as mint packages with no defects.
[right][snapback]214953[/snapback][/right]



I would have to say you may be correct. The three NGC graded commemoratives are taged as die cracks. But, my PCGS graded MS66 1879-s Morgan with a Partial Collar Strike is taged as Mint Error, as which it should be. So I will make sure I do not call die cracks mint errors.
bustchaser
QUOTE(regandon @ May 9 2006, 07:27 AM)
I would have to say you may be correct. The three NGC graded commemoratives are taged as die cracks. But, my PCGS graded MS66 1879-s Morgan with a Partial Collar Strike is taged as Mint Error, as which it should be. So I will make sure I do not call die cracks mint errors.
[right][snapback]215006[/snapback][/right]



bthumbsup.gif Maybe I am no longer just a voice in the wilderness. Someone actually finally got it right!
regandon
QUOTE(bustchaser @ May 9 2006, 11:27 AM)
bthumbsup.gif  Maybe I am no longer just a voice in the wilderness.  Someone actually finally got it right!
[right][snapback]215021[/snapback][/right]



I have found out that after 30+yrs as a collector and Historian, I always keep learning no matter how much I think I may know.
Burks
People are finding die cracks on the Franklin commems too.

Wasn't there something going around about doubling or tripling on some?

Pretty cool to find that though. Not sure if I'd call it a mint error. Interesting that NGC does yet they didn't bother to put it on the insert.
Mark Stilson
It's got to be rare for a "proof commemorative" die crack to make it thru. bthumbsup.gif


I like die cracks and mark them on omnicoin, but I have yet to figure out why some die cracks are listed in the vam's. Like the 1897 o vam 8a or others.
gxseries
Perhaps one of the most hilarious mint commemorative error minted during the Soviet era is this particular coin:

user posted image

user posted image
Eagleeye
confused1.gif okay i know i'll regret this later.....but why is a clock pointing out 10 o'clock hilarious ???
gxseries
QUOTE(Eagleeye @ May 11 2006, 03:26 PM)
confused1.gif  okay i know i'll regret this later.....but why is a clock pointing out 10 o'clock hilarious ???
[right][snapback]215741[/snapback][/right]


I would like you to read the Roman numerals there grin.gif

"1, 2, 3, ?!, 5, 6, etc"
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.