QUOTE(mmarotta @ Feb 15 2006, 03:52 AM)
QUOTE(Ian)
When taking the general `artistry' of the coin into consideration, I would say that not only is it completely unintentional, but that the effect was probably not even noticed by the originators.
I believe that it was intentional. See here:
http://traumwerk.stanford.edu:3455/SeeingThePast/324We have lost something in coins and how to view them. We have taken the 2D view and not any others. It is likely -- appararently, it should be obvious -- that ancient peoples explored the medium and made the most of it.
Coins are three dimensional objects.
From that essay, see, especially
celtic page 1.jpg
celtic page Two.jpg
[right][snapback]158468[/snapback][/right]
I read the article Mike and while some of the visual `evidence' is quite startling (i'm particularly taken by the south arabia coin!!) I remain unconvinced with regards to the Sassanian silver drachms.
Sure, these thin slivers of silver are the canvases for the Sassanian engravers artistic expression. I just struggle to believe that they had the technology to deliberately create a holographic type effect such as the one that can be determined on the image Jorg posted. Are we (those of us that `see' it that is :-) ) seeing what was intended, or are we seeing what WE would like to see.
I think it is both dangerous and erroneous at this stage to attibute skills and technology to the artisans of the time when there is no evidence elsewhere on the coin, let alone in the culture of the time, to support such attribution. Of course closer inspection and observation is now much more incumbent upon us. :-)
I'm far from being close minded on this, but to be honest, i'm not exactly being swept along by the gosh golly wow factor either.....well, maybe a tad..... that south arabia coin.... hmmm.
Ian