QUOTE(mmarotta @ Jan 19 2006, 09:59 PM)
Coins are fine, but coins are just one thing among many -- hey! e pluribus unum: ONE OUT OF MANY.
[right][snapback]149516[/snapback][/right]
Michael! You disappoint me with your quoting of Al Gore!
Our national motto is translated as "Out of many, One" which is a completely different meaning than "One out of many." Our motto, E Pluribus Unum was designed to unite the former colonies into one great nation, whereas switching the position of that one little word "one" changes the meaning to imply that we are just one nation out of many, nothing special, just like any other.
Al Gore had a major flap with his mistranslation back in 1994 when he was making a speech to the Institute on World Affairs promoting a multicultural model for American identity. The error was unfortunate, as the accurate translation of the motto does just as much to promote a multicultural American identity without denigrating the nation.
As for the rim nick, different TPGs may treat them differently, and even the same TPG might treat them differently on different days! For the most part I've found that TPGs are a little more forgiving on rim nicks with gold coins than with base metal coins due to the softness of the metal and the ease with which these seem to occur on gold. That said, if the nick in the coin is as bad as the photo portrays, it may not be graded by NGC or PCGS, and may be net graded by ANACS. Also, there is a distinct difference with the rarity of the coin. For a common date coin, say a 1924 US double eagle, such a nick may prevent grading by the major TPGs since there are thousands of undamaged specimens. For a 1927-D, where there are perhaps a dozen extant, I doubt a rim nick would prevent encapsulation, however it might result in a point or two downgrade (i.e. stealth net grading). I hope this helps!