<b><font size="4">Round 2 - 1500 to 1699 AD - F/H (</font></b><font size="4"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.stujoe.com/pci5/pci5.htm">CompetitionProgress</a><b>)<br></b></font><br><br><b><font size="4">F. Ętheling's William III (1688-1702) of Great Britain, 1696 Sixpence<br></font></b><img border="0" src="http://www.omnicoin.com/coins/896275.jpg" width="605" height="320"><br><b><i><a href="http://www.omnicoin.com/coin_view_enlarge.aspx?id=896275" target="_blank">OmniCoinDescription</a></i></b><br><br><b><font size="4">Versus</font></b><br><br><b><font size="4">H. Peter's UK Elizabeth 1 6d 1582 S2578 mm Bell <br> </font></b><img border="0" src="http://www.omnicoin.com/coins/902531.jpg" width="605" height="320"><br><b><i><a href="http://www.omnicoin.com/coin_view_enlarge.aspx?id=902531" target="_blank">OmniCoin Description</a></i></b>
Full Version: Round 2 - 1500 to 1699 AD - F/H
I voted for the tanner.
Old Big Nose.
QUOTE (Stujoe @ Nov 20 2005, 06:51 PM)
Old Big Nose.
Me too.
Liz.
Can't vote against such a plush wig as that.
Sixpence
William III
QUOTE (izzy452 @ Nov 21 2005, 08:18 PM)
William III
I think it should read Rocky III.
(voted for it)
Portrait Lizzies are scarce....I hate those MODERN William of Orange coins....well....I quite like the farthings 
'Liz I seems to have a bit more character
Tough one. Neither coin really tells a story just monarchs and the coat of arms. All things being equal I'm leaning towards the older
QUOTE (jlueke @ Nov 23 2005, 07:11 PM)
Neither coin really tells a story just monarchs and the coat of arms.
Exactly what i really dig about coins, I wouldn't have it any other way.
the 6D
1696
-Bobby
-Bobby
Tis Liz
Ended
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.