This guy was called Athelstan, a brave warrior, a king respected by his subjects, hated and feared by those whom were his enemies. He won a major battle at Brunanburgh in 937 and drove out the vikings, captured York and extended the Kingdom of England further than any king before him had. He'd survived an assasination attempt by successfully making use of spies and he was the first English king to meddle in continental politics, notably those of France where he gave the French king assistance and even somewhere to stay during his exile.
Athelstan was a legendary king along the lines of the fabled king Arthur, and the real kings Alfred the Great, Eadgar, Canute and Edward the Confessor.
Throughout much of the middle ages he was well known, at least up until the Reformation. During the turmoil of the changing religious atmosphere, many of the old traditions and stories were lost and destroyed. Whilst Alfred the Great and Eadgar continued on in public memory, Athelstan's was largely forgotten and swept aside. The reason for this was the nature of his character. Human nature is to put people, especially kings into labelled boxes, "good king", "bad king". Whilst somehow people have kept the hazy rose tinted view of Alfred the Great and Eadgar and allocated them as "good kings" alongside Richard I (Undeservingly so). Athelstan underwent an identity crisis, for he would neither fit into one box or the other comfortably.
He was a wise and just king, but he also had a streak of deception and ruthlessness in him. It is thought that he had a possible rival to his throne murdered and thought of himself in no uncertain terms as an Emperor and was somewhat egotistical. He wouldn't fit into the religious ideal of what was good for a king, unlike the pure and virtuous St. Edward the Confessor, Athelstan was greedy and ambitious. Thus because he could neither fit into the 'good' or 'bad' king lists comfortably, like most anomalies he was swept under the carpet and ignored.
But perhaps Athelstan is more deserving of a place in history than most English Kings because he portrayed the entire aspects of human nature, the good, the bad and the downright ugly aspects of all humans. Despite all this he managed to retain dignity and repect from his enemies and his friends alike. An innovator, a foresightful king, the first Imperialist in English history who would have been loved by the Victorians. He took great care in ensuring the coinage was standard and of good quality, he was harsh in his punishments of those that abused the coinage. He ensured people caught producing underweight, debased coins were castrated and had their right hand amputated.
So naturally such an important but seldom heard of figure in the history of England would no doubt have grabbed my attention. So as a child i thought yes i shall have to get a coin of him one day, it was a dream of mine that i knew i'd fulfil one day because like Athelstan's view of an enlarged England i'd make it happen.
Fifteen years went on from then and i'd never even seen one turn up on the market. Then one day whilst casually browsing the internet one mysteriously turned up. At $1300 it was not cheap and i didn't have any of the money for it. So i gathered together all of my 17th and 18th century sixpences, all 30 odd of them and i sold off the entire lot. I was going to have this coin even if it was slightly overpriced and even if i had to axe three quarters of my entire collection to get it. Some call it madness, some call it insanity, i call it fulfilling a dream. Many don't think much of the coin, but i love it, and i'd do it all again. If i was told i could have any one coin i wanted in the whole world but i couldn't ever have any more in my collection than that one, then forget the 1933 double eagle, i'd still chose this penny.

So have any of you ever waited decades to get hold of a dream coin that you'd promised yourself you'd get one day...







