QUOTE(SMS @ Apr 3 2008, 08:06 PM)

It might be a VAM-35A, which is worth quite a bit less. I think the easier way to tell the two apart is simply starting at the edge of the left serif on the '1' in the date. Follow down to the denticle right under that point. Now, count the denticles clockwise to the denticle where the die crack/break starts. Three over will give you VAM-29A, four over will give you VAM-35A. Good luck!

Thanks very much for your feedback, SMS!

I have the 4th edition of the VAM book, and 35A isn't listed there. However, I did count the denticles in the picture, and that is one of the reasons that I decided it must be 29A and not a spurious scratch or something. Do you have an online reference for 35A, or pictures you could provide yourself? I would be most grateful!

QUOTE(SMS @ Apr 3 2008, 08:06 PM)

P.S.
I should add that to my knowledge the VAM-29A is a later dies stage break, whereas the VAM-35A is an earlier stage die crack. With eBay pictures that are not that big, it is most definitely hard to tell the full details of the coin. I hope you asked the seller for a larger, higher quality pic of the obverse to examine.
Actually, I didn't -- I was hoping that I would win this coin at the regular price for a 1900-O MS-63, which is what it appears to be. And I did! So I am out practically no money on this baby.
QUOTE(SMS @ Apr 3 2008, 08:06 PM)

Being a later die stage, the strike *shouldn't* be as sharp and should be a bit rounded and dull on a coin with that kind of luster still in it. When trying to determine varieties from eBay pictures, it is a good thing to know approximately what die stage the variety should have occurred in to help determine whether a supposed variety should exist in the condition/state that the coin represents. There's a lot that can be done with tooling. Something to think about.
Looks good though from the pics! Again, good luck!
Thanks!