What is a proper way to reference coins from the Diakov's catalog? I have seen page number followed by the coin number in some auctions, but also group number followed by the coin number. Is there an accepted standard?
Thanks, Dimitri
grivna1726
Dec 26 2007, 02:28 AM
QUOTE(mityaj @ Dec 25 2007, 06:47 PM)
What is a proper way to reference coins from the Diakov's catalog? I have seen page number followed by the coin number in some auctions, but also group number followed by the coin number. Is there an accepted standard?
Thanks, Dimitri
I don't know that there is any accepted standard.
I'm in favor of whatever is the simplest and clearest method to identify the coin being discussed.
IgorS
Dec 26 2007, 01:41 PM
There is no reason to mention page number as group number and coin number are sufficient and unique. So it is group number.coin number
mityaj
Dec 27 2007, 03:31 AM
QUOTE(IgorS @ Dec 26 2007, 05:41 AM)
There is no reason to mention page number as group number and coin number are sufficient and unique. So it is group number.coin number
It makes perfect sense. The only reason I asked is that I saw the page-based reference in the "Alexander" auction in Moscow. Thanks!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.