QUOTE(lucianoalan @ Dec 27 2007, 09:18 AM)

Here are the images I promised a while back. My friend was away fro the holidays and got back this morning.
http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg225/p...bles1908_11.jpg [snipped]
hope I get some conclusive opinions based on these pictures even though I know that you have made your point before the coin even appeared

)
Please take a good look at all the images and, if you need some more, just let me know.
I have looked at the photos and find the following:
1. The head of Nicholas II is badly executed, the beard in particular.
2. The reverse is not the standard reverse as there are several differences. Even if we assume that
the obverse is an unadopted trial by a Mint engraver, the reverse used would have been from the
standard hub used in 1904 and 1909. There was no point in making up a new reverse hub when one
was already in use.
3. The wrong mintmaster initials on the edge; they should be EB. The edge lettering also seems cruder
than genuine specimens.
In my opinion, therefore, the piece is not a genuine product of the St. Petersburg Mint during the time of
Nicholas II.
Some years ago there was a fraud in Canada in which false dies were made and 10 rouble pieces struck
as collateral for a bank loan. It is my understanding that the first batch of pieces were of good gold but most
were just plated. (I cannot give a reference for this story but it was told to me by a reliable dealer.) I wonder
if this1908 piece might not have been part of a similar scheme in Europe during, say, the 1920s or 1930s when
the incorrect date of 1908 would have meant nothing.
RWJ