QUOTE(Rabone @ Jul 14 2005, 11:34 PM)
Now now now Aetheling...
Not nice casting stones across the pond at American coinage.
I believe you Brits have minted a dreaded coin or two in your day...
Say anything with old bug eyes George the 3rd cursed enough to have him on the Obverse, or what was the name of that other chap... Oh yes, Winston. I think you call them Churchills.
Remember, stone chucking in not a family value

[right][snapback]26383[/snapback][/right]
But you'll note i don't collect that junk. Churchill's are hideous and should never have been minted.
As for the George III post 1816 stuff that's the work of Bendetto Pistrucci so what do you expect? He was less interested in making the design nice, but he was more interested in making it striking. He often went over the top with things. If he were alive now he'd probably be one of the minimalist modern 'artists' that chuck a pile of stones in the centre of the flor and call it artistic expression. I call it a pile of stones whichever way you look at it.
If you think his George III stuff is hideous you should sample some of his other work, namely a certain George IV farthing.
I'm also not keen on any of the obverse of British coinge issued since 1985, i hate the 5p, the reverse commemoratives are forced and are total drivel. Did you see that stupid 2002 £5 coin? A child of 7 could have drawn that and submitted it.
Then there was that Cordial Entende £5 coin for 2004 another pile of trash.
Wreath reverse crowns are naff, as is most of the coinage produced since the mid 1920s. The Edward VII and George V obverses aren't all that great either, they are a graders worst nightmare.
The 1977 crown was particularly bad too. Anything else i forget? Oh yeah Henry VIII old head coinage and Edward VI base issue coinages are pretty nasty in the scheme of things.
Most of the other modern British coins i'm luke warm to. So i think the Brits are rivaling the Usians for crap designs. Although let it be noted we haven't gone to spaghetti hair just yet.