Burks
May 23 2007, 09:04 PM
Over the weekend my dad gave me a roll of the new John Adams dollars. At first glance I thought "holy cow, these look much better than Washington's!". Sure enough they really do.
Washington looked like someone whizzed in his Wheaties or stepped in something smelly. At least Adams looks like a somewhat "normal" person.
edix2001
May 23 2007, 10:59 PM
I can't tell ya that I like the John Adams coin better. Certainly Washington's head is much larger on his coin. And Washington's portrait still carries a great deal of the majesty that we are accustomed to when viewing his visage.
My opinion would refer to popularity, and it seems to have fallen off already even tho' only two prexies are out of the box so far. I don't hold out much hope for this series.
Drusus
May 24 2007, 01:08 AM
I think they are both nice looking after a bit of time in the pocket.
Art
May 24 2007, 02:00 AM
It's a draw for me.
thedeadpoint
May 24 2007, 03:10 AM
pics please!!!!
De Orc
May 24 2007, 06:36 AM
Not seen one as yet so cant realy say LOL
BigCanadianM
May 24 2007, 10:55 AM
QUOTE(thedeadpoint @ May 24 2007, 12:05 AM) [snapback]325871[/snapback]
pics please!!!!
Pretty please?
just carl
May 24 2007, 12:13 PM
No photos necessary. They will be all over the place soon enough. I really don't like any of them. Good for insighting new collectors but they just will not go over for spending. I just can't see carrying 20 or 30 of those baby sized dollar coins instead of bills. So far just to many people look at me when trying to spend them and say what is this thing? I know eventually everyone will know what they are but I just can't stand the things. One bank I go to is always trying to get people to take them with very little luck.
jtryka
May 24 2007, 12:50 PM
I like the Adams better, but there is so much empty space on the obverse I wonder why we had to move all the mottos and date to the edge? Adams looks less cartoonish than Washington, though still somewhat bug-eyed. Spend a couple at Wal-mart on the way home from work the other day and the cashier was very excited.
edix2001
May 24 2007, 01:25 PM
They have a common reverse:
thedeadpoint
May 24 2007, 03:45 PM
thanks, edix. I do like Adams' better too.
BigCanadianM
May 24 2007, 06:35 PM
Thanks

I prefer the Adam's as well.
Johnny 1989
May 24 2007, 09:06 PM
Adams does look better but I've said it before & I'll say it again Coins should have profiles & Notes Portraits, they just don't look right the other way round.
Darryl
May 24 2007, 10:59 PM
Adam's all the way
Vfox
May 30 2007, 06:10 AM
Is it okay if I answer "neither"? Lol, I think these coins are just aweful, both of them. I have the P and D of each, and that's only because I am a sucker for collecting US issued coinage. I think the Sacs win hands down, and even those are pretty ugly, haha.
TreasureGirl
May 30 2007, 03:14 PM
QUOTE(Johnny 1989 @ May 24 2007, 04:01 PM) [snapback]325996[/snapback]
Adams does look better but I've said it before & I'll say it again Coins should have profiles & Notes Portraits, they just don't look right the other way round.
I agree. I was pretty excited when I heard about the new Jefferson portrait, but now I find I'm pretty disappointed with it (no dig on the sculptors). Same goes for the new dollars, unfortunately. I hope the designers at the mint don't get too frustrated with compressing all of any given person's face into a fraction of a millimeter while trying at the same time to make said face look realistic. And that's for the next 9 years, at the
least.
Drusus
May 30 2007, 03:30 PM
QUOTE(Johnny 1989 @ May 24 2007, 04:01 PM) [snapback]325996[/snapback]
I'll say it again Coins should have profiles & Notes Portraits, they just don't look right the other way round.
I agree, although I think the new dollars look good, I also think that the side view is best for coins and the regular portrait best for dollars...
TreasureGirl
May 31 2007, 02:50 AM
John Adams.
But then again I'm a huge fan of William Daniels.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.