QUOTE(Kylibar @ Jan 12 2007, 04:49 PM) [snapback]293885[/snapback]
Ok, Ill make this short and simple. I have half a nickle, manufacturing error. Not half a nickle "cut in half with siccors nickle", HALF a nickle. All that aside. I am no coin collector, just a lucky person, or unlucky..depending on how you look at it, somone who looks at the money they are about to spend. I dont care to keep the coin. I know its worth way more than usual. It was made in 1991. I know its age takes the value away, but still a Mint mistake, and worth a bit of money. I know nothing of the coin market, and how to sell such an item, but im not stupid. I know its not counterfeit, ive had that checked, and checked, and checked. I dont know what to do. I just want the money, and somone can add a coin to their collection. How do I sell this coin?
for thoes who asked for a picture - there it is did the best i could with what i have. (digital camera and a magnifying glass)...if not what i think it is, and what ive been told...then what is it??
This is based on looking at your photo, and is no subsitute for actual examination of the coin. I am not a forensic toolmarks expert either.
I think what you have was once a real nickel, but is NOT a real error. What convinced you that the coin is a true mint error? What were the three checks you did on the coin?
There appear to be obvious toolmarks on the "missing" side of that coin. Linear toolmarks going horizontal as if from a scraping tool, peraps a screwdriver that separated two halves, and either an unsual fingerprint or a some circular tollmarks near the edge. I also see evidence of a residue, possibly a glue, beneath the linear toolmarks.
My guess is that it's the remains of a magician's coin made by cutting two nickels in half and gluing the "heads" together. The two halves were later pried apart for some reason. That would explain the marks that I see:
1. The glue left the residue.
2. The linear toolmarks are from prying apart the two halves of the magician's coin.
3. The circular toolmarks are from slicing the original nickel in half.
Again, I can't be sure, but I see no reason to conclude that this is a real error.