L I N K

The date looks a little strange (especially the shape of the "8") ... what do you think?

This is what I have for a 10 kopek:



Don't see something unusual here.

Here is another 1837 EM FX 10 kopecks:

http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/8100/1837emfxne9.jpg

RWJ

Just corroded piece with "doctoring" (dissolved by chemicals and therefore porous and unattractive surfaces). Looks unnatural therefore but is authentic.


WCO

There is an interesting variety of the 1834 EM 10 kopecks, as follows (note the claws on the right):



RWJ

These two pictures are from my 10 1834 10 kopeks (these are getting unusually difficult to find?) :





Definately doesn't look like the unusual variety there. Thanks for the picture Julian.