I'm a new to this world of numismatics, so my knowledge is fairly small. I'm interested in this coin but I'm afraid there's a lot of fakes out there so all help is welcomed.
The seller says it weights 27gr and is 39mm and he garantees the autheticity of this coin.
As you can see it is chopmarked, but it could be fake marks.
Do you think this coin is real?.
Thanks.

I think you're gonna get the same answers you did elsewhere

ok.

You mean they get to ask "Elsewhere" first? . . . .. I thought we were "Elsewhere".

Does the seller have a regular store or business or a long history? Or, is the seller from China and on ebay for the pas three weeks?

Now Rodney, I do get around a bit ya know

He is from germany and feedback is well above 800.

Hello all,
How do you explain this swastika mark ? Why on King Charles IV ?

Swastika mark was probably made a long time ago by some Tibetian monks but it is in reverse. I wouldn't be suprised if someone came up with the idea of reversing it and make it as a chopmark a long time ago.

The chop marks have been placed on the coin to misdirect attention away from the coin itself. Look at the coin, all those raised marks and bumps on the surface - it's a cast fake.

The coin doesn't look right at all.

I've seen the same swastika chopmark on 8 Reale coins I've had before. I had always assumed it was done in India since it appeared along with a Sanskrit chop mark or two more than once on coins I owned, but Tibet is another possibility that had not ocurred to me.

Looks good to me. I'd like to have it.

as far as I know, the swastika is a sacred symbol in Hinduism and Buddhism.
It isn't a exclusive symbol of the nazi, although that's what ppl think.

Couldn't those bumps be due to the hammering made to chopmark the other side of the coin?.

True, and the same mark was used by American indians as well. I've seen it on old textiles by southwestern tribes.

assuming the dies are coin-alligned, the raised marks do not correspond too well with the chop marks on the opposite side.