Coins
World Coins
British Coins
Canadian Coins
Russian Coins
Exonumia
Error Coins
Fake Coins
Banknotes

Coin People Forum
Gallery
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
OmniCoin
BNB
Email

RSS

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Approved Design For the Standing Liberty Quarter..., What It Was Supposed To Look Like
Scottishmoney
post Apr 28 2008, 10:06 PM
Post #1


unentitled and not chosen ;(~
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,124
Joined: 14-June 05
From: Krasny Vostok
Member No.: 38



From the Stack's Auction



Hermon MacNeil's approved obverse design for the 1916 Standing Liberty Quarter. Possibly unique bronze cast intended for preparation of dies, September 1916.


On seeing this spectacular piece for the first time the reaction is, "Wow! So that's what a Standing Liberty quarter is supposed to look like!" But after a moment, the eye is drawn to two playful dolphins aside Liberty's feet, then to the motto IN GOD WE TRUST draped across Miss Liberty, to sprigs of laurel and last, the missing olive branch. What kind of Standing Liberty quarter is this? The truth is this is what Hermon MacNeil had intended his new quarter to look like.

In May 1916 MacNeil submitted his first design models for the new quarter. This first obverse looked much like the regular quarters dated 1916 and familiar to collectors. But over the next weeks MacNeil became increasingly dissatisfied with his work. With changes in mind, MacNeil requested permission from Mint Director Robert Woolley to revise the obverse. The sculptor said he wanted:



1. To bring the head of the figure a trifle lower so as not to appear to be holding up the rim of the coin.

2. To prevent the figure appearing "bowlegged."

3. To minimize the sagging of the covering of the shield by having it pulled up a little tighter.

I should also like to see the letters of the word Liberty slightly smaller.



Since Adolph Weinman, who was designing the new dime and half dollar, had already been given permission to change his original compositions, Woolley agreed.

During July and August 1916 Hermon MacNeil radically rearranged and modified the elements of his obverse design. Except for the names given to parts of the design, nearly everything was changed. The overall relief was made more pronounced, and drapery softened. Starting with the border, the original dot-dot-dash pattern was replaced with a cable or chain surrounding the central elements. The portal walls through which Liberty steps were plain - unadorned with either motto or detail. On the upper step at the base of the wall are two dolphins, one on each side of Liberty's feet. The dolphins represent the Atlantic and Pacific oceans much as they did on the 1915 Panama-Pacific International Exposition gold dollar designed by Charles Keck or Robert Aitken's $50 gold piece. Above each dolphin's tail is a laurel branch symbolic of civil triumph; at the upper rim is the word LIBERTY in letters somewhat smaller and much sharper than on the first obverse.

The figure of Liberty differs completely from that on the first design, although she is still semi-nude. She now wears cross-laced sandals in the ancient Roman style and carries a shield embossed with an eagle. The shield covering is also more closely fit and less baggy. A long sash or ribbon engraved IN GOD WE TRUST connects the shield and her outstretched right hand ending near the laurel branch. There is no olive branch of peace, the whole new design being more militant and actively protective.

Treasury Secretary McAdoo approved the design on August 19, and asked MacNeil to provide a photograph showing the proposed location of the artist's monogram or initial. (This photo still exists.) This was done and the new Mint Director, F. J. H. von Engelken, replied on September 1,



Placing of signature under head of dolphin on right of Quarter Dollar approved. You are at liberty to use either the letter "M" alone, or that monogram of two letters.



MacNeil was asked to expedite delivery of bronze casts and these were scheduled for delivery on September 9. From this point forward the mint should have made reductions and struck a few pattern pieces for von Engelken and others to examine. But from here to the end of the year official records are silent. No pattern coins are known. Do some exist, hidden in an old cigar box in Virginia or Tennessee?

One bronze cast reached the Philadelphia Mint. Another, the present example, must have remained in MacNeil's College Point, NY studio - a backup in case the first one were lost or damaged.



Pedigree of this Cast

After Hermon MacNeil died, the contents of his studio were reportedly hauled to the dump. Some of his drawings and other items were salvaged by a neighbor, commercial illustrator John A. Coughlin. Mr. Coughlin is the source of the famous flying eagle drawings purchased by Eric P. Newman, and of MacNeil scrapbooks and letters now preserved in the Smithsonian Archives of American Art located in Washington, DC. It is possible this bronze cast and its companion (lot 1379) were rescued in a similar manner. It was not until 2001 that the present consignor purchased these casts at a garage sale. They were bought mostly as curiosities although there was some thought they were connected to the Standing Liberty quarter design.



Rarity and Condition

"Rarity" is a weak term when applied to this beautiful 1916 cast by MacNeil. One copy probably is entombed in a basement vault at the Philadelphia Mint along with other casts, galvanos and models. Since first gaining national publicity in 2004, no one has come forward with anything similar. This historic piece is not only likely unique in any private collection, but it is one of only a very few original casts or galvanos of coin designs available to collectors.

The piece is in virtually perfect condition, the main designs toned in pale gold and exhibiting a few small flecks of discoloration here and there. A small incuse mark (some sort of centering mark?) is noted at center of face near the folds of drapery.



Description

This is a bronze bas-relief cast apparently made from Hermon MacNeil's approved model for the 1916 Standing Liberty quarter. It was plated with nickel or similar metal.

Liberty is walking forward through a plain gate or portal. She holds a partially uncovered shield in her left hand; her right hand holds the end of a sash inscribed IN GOD WE TRUST. To left and right are branches of laurel, symbolic of triumph; below each is a dolphin symbolic of the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. At the rim and encompassing all is a cable or chain design emphasizing unity and strength.

The graceful figure is in medium relief with somewhat soft modeling to her gown. Lettering is in strong relief, somewhat smaller than on the previous design. Motto letters are incuse and thin on the sash connecting hand and shield. Shield has 13 stars exposed surrounding an eagle. Artist's initial (M) appears below the dolphin on the right.



Diameter of cast: 6 inches (157 millimeters) by 5-5/16 inches (150 millimeters), irregular.

Diameter of design: 5-1/8 inches (130 millimeters)

Thickness: Approximately 4 millimeters at greatest point.

Weight: 358.64 grams

Thanks to researcher Roger W. Burdette for his guest cataloguing of this and the following lot.

Link to actual auction:

Approved Design for Standing Liberty Quarter

I myself would love to bid, but I am still recovering from the auction that closed last Thursday. bthumbsup.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TreasureGirl
post Apr 28 2008, 11:12 PM
Post #2


Pirate and soon-to-be Darksider
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 933
Joined: 14-January 07
From: O'Fallon, MO
Member No.: 2,236



Breathtaking.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Drusus
post Apr 29 2008, 12:39 AM
Post #3


Pecvniate obedivnt omnia
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 1,551
Joined: 7-October 06
From: Houston, Tx
Member No.: 1,580



It is outstanding...thanks
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
thedeadpoint
post Apr 29 2008, 07:07 AM
Post #4


Huh what?
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,259
Joined: 16-July 06
From: Le heat!
Member No.: 1,203
OmniCoin BanknoteBank


Lovely. Thanks for sharing, SM.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NumisMattic2200
post Apr 29 2008, 09:05 AM
Post #5


NumisMattic2200
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 1,843
Joined: 9-June 07
From: England
Member No.: 3,509



Proves that mint directors have no idea what a coin should look like wink.gif

She is a stunner!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bill
post Apr 30 2008, 05:35 AM
Post #6


Feeling younger everyday.
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 2,094
Joined: 10-December 05
From: California
Member No.: 589
OmniCoin


Burdete's three volume series on the design of American coinage 1905 to 1921 is excellent, well researched and well illustrated. I agree, these are exceptional pieces.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hiho
post Apr 30 2008, 09:40 AM
Post #7


French Marianne Medal
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 805
Joined: 21-January 08
From: New York City
Member No.: 4,696



Love the design, but the dolphins bother me. Far from playful, to me they look somewhat menacing.

Much better on the 1915 Panama-Pacific gold dollar.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Scottishmoney
post Apr 30 2008, 10:29 AM
Post #8


unentitled and not chosen ;(~
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,124
Joined: 14-June 05
From: Krasny Vostok
Member No.: 38



I cannot say I care for the dolphins, actually I believe they were inspired as you note by the dolphins on the dollar coin and Half Union from 1915 for the Panama Pacific Expo. I do like this Miss Liberty much better, especially with the IGWT ribbon draped over her. It surely emphasizes how the mint changes designs, even those that were approved.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gpnyc
post Apr 30 2008, 03:30 PM
Post #9


SPQR
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 896
Joined: 17-June 05
From: New York
Member No.: 129
OmniCoin


Having only seen the obverse, I can say that this is one case where the approved design is superior. I mean... dolphins? Come now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Scottishmoney
post Apr 30 2008, 05:50 PM
Post #10


unentitled and not chosen ;(~
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,124
Joined: 14-June 05
From: Krasny Vostok
Member No.: 38



QUOTE (gpnyc @ Apr 30 2008, 11:30 AM) *
Having only seen the obverse, I can say that this is one case where the approved design is superior. I mean... dolphins? Come now.



Actually if you look at the auction, there in RSS feeds where they have the actual catalogue there is a copy of the approval letter for this, this is the approved design. I do agree the dolphins are rather cartoonish and inappropriate on the piece, but I do like the rest of the design better than the mint version.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 






RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd September 2010 - 06:50 PM