everycountrycoins Posted February 28, 2016 Report Share Posted February 28, 2016 Hey Canadian coin people,I was just looking at my 2012 base metal 2012 Canada proof set. As you may know, the quarter in this set is supposed to be composed of nickel (as are the 5, 10, and 50 cent coins). They are all appropriately magnetic except for the 25 cent piece. Does anybody know why this might be? At the very least, can any of you confirm this observation?Thanks in advance,Bruce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccg Posted February 28, 2016 Report Share Posted February 28, 2016 Try to get it XRF scanned. Regardless of steel or nickel, it should be magnetic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
everycountrycoins Posted February 28, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2016 If I had an easy means of getting it XRF scanned, I probably would. Another collector reported having a magnetic quarter in one of the other 40,000 sets of this type. This only enhances my curiosity. I suspect that I will never know for sure why it is different. I'm not even sure why I happened to check it in the first place! :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedeadpoint Posted March 1, 2016 Report Share Posted March 1, 2016 Very cool - maybe reach out to some researchers at UW! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
everycountrycoins Posted March 13, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 13, 2016 In fact I did reach out to a geoscientist. He said that if it is in a 1/16” or 1/32” solid plastic “window," then it is virtually impossible to get X-rays in and/or X-rays out. Also, "Assuming it is “plastic” and of some thickness more than a few microns or tens of microns, I doubt that any ‘normal’ XRF device could be used to determine the elemental composition." I guess the specific answer as to why a magnet doesn't attract it will remain a mystery.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedeadpoint Posted March 15, 2016 Report Share Posted March 15, 2016 Well, that's some sort of resolution? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
everycountrycoins Posted March 18, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 18, 2016 Well, I had it tested with an electron microscope today. The conclusion--an approximately 75/25 copper/nickel alloy. I have no idea where it may have come from, but it clearly was not the composition that it should have been. I guess a 75/25 C-N alloy isn't magnetic? Well, hopefully somebody will consider this "error" to be valuable. 56 percent nickel is required before the alloy shows ferro-magnetic properties at ordinary temperature. Thus, all makes much more sense, now (other than the origin of this non-standard proof planchet). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedeadpoint Posted March 22, 2016 Report Share Posted March 22, 2016 A Cu/Ni alloy is unexpected for that coin? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
everycountrycoins Posted March 22, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 22, 2016 Yes. The mint designated planchets for the proof set quarters were either composed of nickel or silver. The nickel ones are easy to identify as such with a magnet. I had another person who has one of these sets check his quarter with a magnet. It was nickel (as it was supposed to). Thus, if this is a rare planchet error coin, it is probably going to be worth at least $100 to somebody (or possibly more if it turns out to be possibly unique). I'm glad that I noticed that it wasn't magnetic! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedeadpoint Posted March 24, 2016 Report Share Posted March 24, 2016 Does it look any different? As in, can you tell it looks a little off? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
everycountrycoins Posted March 31, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2016 No, but I wouldn't really expect it to. A polished, proof nickel coin should probably look about the same as a polished, proof copper-nickel coin. The obvious difference is laid bare by the magnet. I knew that it couldn't be nickel. The test provided an answer that is consistent and plausible. I wish that I knew how rare this coin is (and which people would love to have it). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pharaohs-gold Posted October 5, 2016 Report Share Posted October 5, 2016 Have you heard of any more of these coins since your original post? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.